On Tue 07-10-14 13:46:20, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Oct 7, 2014, at 1:29 PM, Jan Kara j...@suse.cz wrote:
On Tue 07-10-14 07:30:28, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:31:25PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
We support user, group, and project quotas. Tell VFS about it.
CC:
Hi,
Apologies for taking so long - I've added this into the -nmw tree now.
Thanks,
Steve.
On 03/10/14 19:15, Fabian Frederick wrote:
use macro definition
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick f...@skynet.be
---
fs/gfs2/glock.c | 4 ++--
fs/gfs2/glops.c | 2 +-
fs/gfs2/trans.c | 2 +-
3
From: Bob Peterson rpete...@redhat.com
This patch fixes a regression in the patch GFS2: Remember directory
insert point, commit 2b47dad866d04f14c328f888ba5406057b8c7d33.
The problem had to do with the rename function: The function found
space for the new dirent, and remembered that location. But
Hi,
Not a huge amount this time... just four patches. This time we have a couple
of bug fixes, one relating to bad i_goal values which are now ignored (i_goal
is basically a hint so it is safe to so this) and another relating to the
saving of the dirent location during rename. There is one
From: Bob Peterson rpete...@redhat.com
This patch speeds up GFS2 unlink operations by using function
gfs2_rbm_incr rather than continuously calculating the rbm.
Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson rpete...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse swhit...@redhat.com
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/rgrp.c
Hi,
Steve Whitehouse wrote:
| I'd much prefer to see an algorithm that is adaptive, rather than simply
| bumping up the default here. We do need to be able to cope with cases
| where the files are much smaller, and without adaptive sizing, we might
| land up creating small holes in the
Hi,
Please consider pulling the following changes,
Steve.
-
The following changes since commit 37504a3be90b69438426d74ccf467a9fe192932b:
Merge tag 'gfs2-fixes' of
Hi,
This patch uses journal numbers to evenly distribute which node
prefers which resource groups for block allocations. This is to
help performance. The idea is to make each node in the cluster
prefer to use a certain subset of resource groups for its block
allocations. Other nodes use a
