Hello!
On Feb 2, 2015, at 12:37 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:59:54PM -0500, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
>> From: Oleg Drokin
>>
>> leaf_dealloc uses vzalloc as a fallback to kzalloc(GFP_NOFS), so
>> it clearly does not want any shrinker activity within the fs itself.
>>
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 10:59:54PM -0500, gr...@linuxhacker.ru wrote:
> From: Oleg Drokin
>
> leaf_dealloc uses vzalloc as a fallback to kzalloc(GFP_NOFS), so
> it clearly does not want any shrinker activity within the fs itself.
> convert vzalloc into __vmalloc(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_ZERO) to better ach
From: Oleg Drokin
leaf_dealloc uses vzalloc as a fallback to kzalloc(GFP_NOFS), so
it clearly does not want any shrinker activity within the fs itself.
convert vzalloc into __vmalloc(GFP_NOFS|__GFP_ZERO) to better achieve
this goal.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin
---
fs/gfs2/dir.c | 3 ++-
1 file
This patch introduces the use of function put_unaligned_be16.
This is done using Coccinelle and semantic patch used is as follows:
@a@
typedef u16, __be16, uint16_t;
{u16,__be16,uint16_t} e16;
identifier tmp;
expression ptr;
expression y,e;
type T;
@@
- tmp = cpu_to_be16(y);
<+... when != tmp
(
