Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH/RFC] Standardize on /etc/sysconfig/cluster for init script

2008-07-28 Thread david m. richter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:20 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I just noticed that we have a very inconsistent way to set init script defaults by using /etc/sysconfig/{cman,cluster,scsi_reserve}. the patch in attachment is very simple and standardize everything to

[Cluster-devel] Re: cluster3 build: libdlm.h and PATH_MAX

2008-10-01 Thread david m. richter
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:15 PM, david m. richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, I should've asked on IRC before you folks all left for your conference, but these are two things I'd forgotten about until now (because I'm setting up a new cluster from scratch). [libdlm.h] First, I'm

Re: [Cluster-devel] cluster3 build: libdlm.h and PATH_MAX

2008-10-02 Thread david m. richter
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2008, david m. richter wrote: hello, I should've asked on IRC before you folks all left for your conference, but these are two things I'd forgotten about until now (because I'm setting up a new cluster

Re: [Cluster-devel] gfs uevent and sysfs changes

2008-12-04 Thread david m. richter
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Teigland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the compatibility aspects to the recent ideas about changes to the user/kernel interface between gfs (1 2) and gfs_controld. . gfs_controld can remove id from hostdata string in mount options hi david, I know

Re: [Cluster-devel] gfs uevent and sysfs changes

2008-12-04 Thread david m. richter
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:07 PM, David Teigland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 01:32:31PM -0500, david m. richter wrote: On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 12:31 PM, David Teigland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here are the compatibility aspects to the recent ideas about changes to the user

Re: [Cluster-devel] gfs uevent and sysfs changes

2008-12-05 Thread david m. richter
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:38 PM, David Teigland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 04:59:23PM -0500, david m. richter wrote: ah, so just to make sure i'm with you here: (1) gfs_controld is generating this id-which-is-the-mountgroup-id, and (2) gfs_kernel will no longer receive