Hi David,
On 12/01/2016 12:16 AM, David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:07:22PM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
a. Should we put recover_lvb() even before recover_conversion()? if not, why?
Yes, I think you're right. The lvb decision should be made using the
original lock modes, no
Hi David,
On 11/16/2016 11:08 PM, David Teigland wrote:
convert(R1, EX)
get LVB
Qustion: what is the LVB then? x or y?
==
Is this a valid question? or am I missing something?
It's a good question, and it's been enough years that the details are now
hazy. I think the current behavior emula
Hi!
On 11/16/2016 11:08 PM, David Teigland wrote:
convert(R1, EX)
get LVB
Qustion: what is the LVB then? x or y?
==
Is this a valid question? or am I missing something?
It's a good question, and it's been enough years that the details are now
hazy. I think the current behavior emula
On 11/16/2016 04:29 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
Hi David and all,
I am debugging an issue of ocfs2 that relates to LVB value. I will try to make it a pure
DLM question:
Two nodes (N1, N2) try to truncate the same file(R1) concurrently.
N1 N2
lock(R1, EX
Hi David and all,
I am debugging an issue of ocfs2 that relates to LVB value. I will try to make it a pure DLM
question:
Two nodes (N1, N2) try to truncate the same file(R1) concurrently.
N1 N2
lock(R1, EX)
changing LVB: x
Hi,
On 10/25/2016 01:03 PM, weiyongjun (A) wrote:
Hi Eric,
-Original Message-
From: Eric Ren [mailto:z...@suse.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 10:52 AM
To: Wei Yongjun ; Christine Caulfield
; David Teigland ; cluster-
de...@redhat.com; weiyongjun (A)
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel
Hi,
Coding style patch is always rejected;-)
Eric
On 10/22/2016 10:37 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun
Fix to return a negative error code from the error handling
case instead of 0, as done elsewhere in this function.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun
---
fs/dlm/lowcomms.c | 3 ++-
1 fi
_create_file() with debugfs_create_file_unsafe();
2nd, make different table_open#() accordingly. The 1st one
is neat, but I don't thoroughly understand its risk. Maybe
someone has a better one.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
---
fs/dlm/debug_fs.c | 62 ++
Hi David,
On 05/19/2016 02:50 AM, David Teigland wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 02:53:00PM +0800, Eric Ren wrote:
Q1: what's stateful merged node?
Q2: what if we add the stateful merged nodes to dlm_controld daemon
cpg instead of fencing them?
The details here are fundamental to th
uot; becomes true.
David advised me to do the right thing;-) Thanks a lot!
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
---
dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c | 11 +--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c b/dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c
index 356e80d..0d55027 10064
node, it looks like every node own this volume; so corruption may happen?
Thanks a lot,
Eric
On 05/17/2016 08:10 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
Hi David,
This is just a draft patch for you to review;-) There's an issue I'm
not sure: where should we clear "stateful_merge_wait"?
Hello David:
On 05/17/2016 01:12 AM, David Teigland wrote:
This looks good. Would you still use this patch if we add the new
dlm_tool output from the other email?
Please hold back this for now;-) I prefer to drop this method if the
latter one works better. And I'm trying to working this out
uot; becomes true.
David advised me to do the right thing;-) Thanks a lot!
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
---
dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c | 10 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c b/dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c
index 356e80d..8f6434f 100644
---
Hi David,
This is just a draft patch for you to review;-) There's an issue I'm
not sure: where should we clear "stateful_merge_wait"?
And I need more communications with pacemaker guys and more time for testing.
I will send you the formal patch if things get done;-)
Thanks,
Eric
e merged partitions are kicking the other out of the cluster
at the same time.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
---
dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c | 6 +-
dlm_controld/dlm.conf.5 | 2 ++
dlm_controld/dlm_controld.8 | 5 +
dlm_controld/dlm_daemon.h | 1 +
dlm_controld/main.c | 6 +++
Hi David,
On 05/13/2016 11:49 PM, David Teigland wrote:
If both sides of the merged partition are kicking the other out of the
cluster at the same time, it's hard to predict which nodes will remain
(and it could be none). To resolve an even partition merge, you need to
remove/restart the nodes
Hi David,
Thanks very very much for explaining this to me in such nice way;-)
On 05/13/2016 12:51 AM, David Teigland wrote:
T = time in seconds, A,B,C = cluster nodes.
At T=1 A,B,C become members and have quorum.
At T=10 a partition creates A,B | C.
At T=11 it merges and creates A,B,C.
At T=
time".
We now skip this chance of telling corosync to kill cluster for
stateful merge. As a result, any fencing cannot proceed further.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
---
dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dlm_controld/daemon_cpg.c b/dlm_contro
lable with wait_event_interruptible can fix
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
Acked-by: David Teigland
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 5532f09..88f1036 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
lable with wait_event_interruptible can fix
this issue.
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren
Acked-by: David Teigland
---
fs/dlm/plock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c
index 5532f09..88f1036 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/plock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c
Hi David and all,
After using this patch, deadlock test for posix file lock, both on local and
on cluster mode for ocfs2, acts the same now as other local fs like ext4.
But, I have no gfs2 environment to verify if this issue would happen and can
be fixed by this patch. Hope anyone working on gfs2
Hi Divad,
Please see comments in lines;-)
David Teigland write：
>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 04:30:53AM -0600, Zhen Ren wrote:
>> It expects alarm timeout to send SIGALRM, and wake up the sleep process,
>> as "man fcntl" says: "If a signal is caught while waiting, then
>> the call is inter
22 matches
Mail list logo
