- Original Message -
This patch introduces a new block reservation doubling scheme. If we
Maybe I sent this patch out prematurely. Instead of doubling the
reservation, maybe I should experiment with making it grow additively.
IOW, Instead of 32-64-128-256-512, I should use:
Hi,
On 10/10/14 04:39, Bob Peterson wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
This patch introduces a new block reservation doubling scheme. If we
Maybe I sent this patch out prematurely. Instead of doubling the
reservation, maybe I should experiment with making it
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
This patch introduces a new block reservation doubling scheme. If we
Maybe I sent this patch out prematurely. Instead of doubling the
reservation, maybe I should experiment with making it grow additively.
IOW, Instead of
Hi,
Steve Whitehouse wrote:
| I'd much prefer to see an algorithm that is adaptive, rather than simply
| bumping up the default here. We do need to be able to cope with cases
| where the files are much smaller, and without adaptive sizing, we might
| land up creating small holes in the
