- Original Message -
> Bob,
>
> how hard would it be to move the rhashtable into struct gfs2_sbd instead?
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
Hi Andreas,
I've suggested moving the glock hash table into the superblock a couple times
in the past, when it was still a normal hash table, but I've always b
Hi,
On 22/08/15 23:00, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Bob,
how hard would it be to move the rhashtable into struct gfs2_sbd instead?
Thanks,
Andreas
What would be the advantage?
Steve.
Bob,
how hard would it be to move the rhashtable into struct gfs2_sbd instead?
Thanks,
Andreas
Hi,
On 13/07/15 14:39, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
Hi,
On 09/07/15 19:25, Bob Peterson wrote:
What uniquely identifies a glock in the glock hash table is not
gl_name, but gl_name and its superblock pointer. This patch makes
the gl_name field correspond to a unique gl
Hi,
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On 09/07/15 19:25, Bob Peterson wrote:
> > What uniquely identifies a glock in the glock hash table is not
> > gl_name, but gl_name and its superblock pointer. This patch makes
> > the gl_name field correspond to a unique glock identifier. That will
> >
