Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-18 Thread David Teigland
The patches are now here for testing https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/teigland/linux-dlm.git/log/?h=next Dave

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-14 Thread Bob Peterson
- Original Message - | Hi, | | This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to | fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. | We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine. | | Patch number 01/02/03 were posted on this mailing

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-14 Thread Bob Peterson
- Original Message - | Hi, | | | On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu@toshiba.co.jp wrote: | > Hi, | > | > This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to | > fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. | > We'd like reviewed to make sure those

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-13 Thread David Teigland
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:51:06AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > > On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu@toshiba.co.jp wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to > > fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. > >

Re: [Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-13 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On 12/09/17 09:54, tsutomu@toshiba.co.jp wrote: Hi, This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine. Patch number 01/02/03 were posted

[Cluster-devel] [PATCH 00/18] [try #2] DLM: dlm patches need review

2017-09-12 Thread tsutomu.owa
Hi, This series of patches (2nd version after previous review on August) is to fix various bugs. This patch set is against the mainline kernel. We'd like reviewed to make sure those changes are fine. Patch number 01/02/03 were posted on this mailing list. However, I've modifed 03 to correct a