On 29/01/18 13:30, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi Andy,
- Original Message -
| I've just realised that these aren't in for-next despite the positive
| response. Can they get in for the upcoming merge window?
Your three patches are indeed already included in for-next and
have been for some
Hi Andy,
- Original Message -
| I've just realised that these aren't in for-next despite the positive
| response. Can they get in for the upcoming merge window?
Your three patches are indeed already included in for-next and
have been for some time. I'm not sure why you're not seeing
Hi Bob,
On 08/12/17 15:14, Bob Peterson wrote:
- Original Message -
| These patches add new fields to struct gfs2_rgrp. The intention is to improve
| fsck performance and error checking while reducing reliance on the rindex to
| be read in order to scan through the resource groups in
- Original Message -
| These patches add new fields to struct gfs2_rgrp. The intention is to improve
| fsck performance and error checking while reducing reliance on the rindex to
| be read in order to scan through the resource groups in tools such as
| fsck.gfs2. This is part of a wider
