Re: [Cluster-devel] [Patch 09/44] fsck.gfs2: Rename the nlink functions to make them more intuitive

Hi, Why is the link count only 16 bits? Where is it checked for overflow? Steve. On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 17:01 -0400, Bob Peterson wrote: From 55e442c79adec0fa7f6d4e7f6700f14a630d4e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Peterson rpete...@redhat.com Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:01:18 -0500 Subject:

[Cluster-devel] [Patch 09/44] fsck.gfs2: Rename the nlink functions to make them more intuitive

From 55e442c79adec0fa7f6d4e7f6700f14a630d4e3e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Peterson rpete...@redhat.com Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:01:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 09/44] fsck.gfs2: Rename the nlink functions to make them more intuitive Part of fsck's checks is to verify the count of links for