On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> 2. Do we need to revalidate mappings for directio writes? I think the
> answer is no (for xfs) because the ->iomap_begin call will allocate
> whatever blocks are needed and truncate/punch/reflink block on the
> iolock while the
Am Mi., 18. Jan. 2023 um 20:04 Uhr schrieb Darrick J. Wong :
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:21:38PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > I don't have any objections to pulling everything except patches 8 and
> > > 10 for testing
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:21:38PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > I don't have any objections to pulling everything except patches 8 and
> > 10 for testing this week.
>
> That would be great. I now have a series to return
On 1/18/23 16:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
>> I don't have any objections to pulling everything except patches 8 and
>> 10 for testing this week.
>
> That would be great. I now have a series to return the ERR_PTR
> from
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 09:29:58AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> I don't have any objections to pulling everything except patches 8 and
> 10 for testing this week.
That would be great. I now have a series to return the ERR_PTR
from __filemap_get_folio which will cause a minor conflict, but
I
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 02:09:07AM +0100, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> Am Mo., 9. Jan. 2023 um 23:58 Uhr schrieb Dave Chinner :
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 08:59:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Indeed, we also have this same "iomap valid check" functionality in the
> writeback code as cached iomaps can become stale due to racing
> writeback, truncated, etc. But you wouldn't know it by looking at the iomap
> writeback code -
Am Mo., 9. Jan. 2023 um 23:58 Uhr schrieb Dave Chinner :
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > > Eliminate the ->iomap_valid()
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:45:27PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > Eliminate the ->iomap_valid() handler by switching to a ->get_folio()
> > > handler and
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 10:59 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Eliminate the ->iomap_valid() handler by switching to a ->get_folio()
> > handler and validating the mapping there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
>
> I
On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Eliminate the ->iomap_valid() handler by switching to a ->get_folio()
> handler and validating the mapping there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
I think this is wrong.
The ->iomap_valid() function handles a
Eliminate the ->iomap_valid() handler by switching to a ->get_folio()
handler and validating the mapping there.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 26 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 37 ++---
include/linux/iomap.h
13 matches
Mail list logo
