On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:51 AM, David Teigland teigl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:18:09PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:55 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:23:20PM +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
+ result =
and...@beekhof.net, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.de
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] dlm: enhancing dlm_controld
(pcmk) to be able to handle redundant rings
Reply-To:
In-Reply-To: 20091016101722.gz15...@suse.de
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:17
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:38 PM, jjzhang jjzhang.li...@gmail.com wrote:
and...@beekhof.net, Lars Marowsky-Bree l...@suse.de
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Bcc:
Subject: Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH] dlm: enhancing dlm_controld
(pcmk) to be able to handle redundant rings
Reply
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:38 PM, jjzhang jjzhang.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:17:22PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2009-10-15T09:51:08, David Teigland teigl...@redhat.com wrote:
On
On 2009-10-23T21:23:20, Jiaju Zhang jjzhang.li...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, Thanks :)
Please see the attachment.
Thanks for the work, this looks good.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:23:20PM +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
+result = corosync_cfg_ring_status_get(handle,
+ interface_names,
+ interface_status,
+ interface_count);
+if
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:55 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:23:20PM +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
+result = corosync_cfg_ring_status_get(handle,
+ interface_names,
+ interface_status,
+
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 12:18:09PM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 12:55 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:23:20PM +0800, Jiaju Zhang wrote:
+result = corosync_cfg_ring_status_get(handle,
+ interface_names,
+
On 2009-10-15T09:51:08, David Teigland teigl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:43:56AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Looks good to me :-)
Although it might be nice to have the automated detection in place too.
Less things for the admin to get wrong. What do you think Dave?
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Teigland teigl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:43:56AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Looks good to me :-)
Although it might be nice to have the automated detection in place too.
Less things for the admin to get wrong. What do you think
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Andrew Beekhof and...@beekhof.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:51 PM, David Teigland teigl...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:43:56AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
Looks good to me :-)
Although it might be nice to have the automated
I'd like to resend the patch as attachment since it may have some format
problem
when I sent it last time.
Thanks,
Jiaju
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jiaju Zhang jjzhang.li...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
Since there is no proper way to enable SCTP when using pacemaker stack,
this patch is to
12 matches
Mail list logo
