Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-14 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 12:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: [resending since mail server dropped it] On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Hi, On Thu,

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-13 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [Just forwarding to David ...] On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: on

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [Just forwarding to David ...] On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-13 Thread Randy Dunlap
[resending since mail server dropped it] On 05/13/13 12:34, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 12:31, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 09:30, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/13/13 02:18, Steven Whitehouse wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 10:08 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: On 05/09/13 09:50, David

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-09 Thread David Teigland
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [Just forwarding to David ...] On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: on x86_64: when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m: fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock':

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-09 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/09/13 09:50, David Teigland wrote: On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:47:45AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [Just forwarding to David ...] On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: on x86_64: when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m:

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-08 Thread Randy Dunlap
On 05/07/13 21:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released. I am receiving a (un)reasonable number of conflicts from there being multiple copies of some commits in various trees.

Re: [Cluster-devel] linux-next: Tree for May 8 (dlm)

2013-05-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
[Just forwarding to David ...] On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:04:45 -0700 Randy Dunlap rdun...@infradead.org wrote: on x86_64: when CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y and CONFIG_DLM=m: fs/built-in.o: In function `gfs2_lock': file.c:(.text+0xa512c): undefined reference to `dlm_posix_get'