linux-fs.git bdi
>
> Since all patches got reviewed by Christoph, can you please pick them up Jens?
> Thanks!
Yep, picked up for 4.12. Thanks Jan!
--
Jens Axboe
re) <rost...@goodmis.org>
I'll take it through my tree, and I'll prune some of that comment
as well (which should be a commit message thing, not a code comment).
--
Jens Axboe
io, ...) have been run with this patchset,
> and not see regression.
>
> Thanks Christoph for reviewing the early version and providing very good
> suggestions, such as: introduce bio_init_with_vec_table(), remove another
> unnecessary helpers for cleanup and so on.
>
> Thanks Chritoph and Omar for reviewing V10/V11/V12, and provides lots of
> helpful comments.
Thanks for persisting in this endeavor, Ming, I've applied this for 5.1.
--
Jens Axboe
and seems Ewan and Mike is waiting for this fix.
Not familiar with this issue, can you post a link to it? I'd be fine
working around anything until 4.22, it's not going to be a new issue.
--
Jens Axboe
ther
it's a good idea to target this for 4.21, or if we should wait until
4.22. 4.21 has a fairly substantial amount of changes in terms of block
already, it's not the best timing for something of this magnitude too.
I'm going back and forth on those one a bit. Any concerns with
pushing this to 4.22?
--
Jens Axboe
the fact that they
are done in conjunction with supporting multipage bvecs. That
very fact will be irrelevant very soon
--
Jens Axboe
^^^
v15?
> Lots of test(blktest, xfstests, ltp io, ...) have been run with this patchset,
> and not see regression.
>
> Thanks Christoph for reviewing the early version and providing very good
> suggestions, such as: introduce bio_init_with_vec_table(), remove another
> unnecessary helpers for cleanup and so on.
>
> Thanks Chritoph and Omar for reviewing V10/V11/V12, and provides lots of
> helpful comments.
Applied, thanks Ming. Let's hope it sticks!
--
Jens Axboe
On 2/15/19 10:14 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 08:49 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/15/19 4:13 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>> This patchset brings multi-page bvec into block layer:
>>
>> Applied, thanks Ming. Let's hope it sticks!
>
> Hi Je
arity helper
commit: 7b47ef52d0a2025fd1408a8a0990933b8e1e510f
[26/27] block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
commit: 44abff2c0b970ae3d310b97617525dc01f248d7c
[27/27] direct-io: remove random prefetches
commit: c22198e78d523c8fa079bbb70b2523bb6aa51849
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
On 5/26/23 12:37 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 24.05.23 17:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 5/2/23 4:19?AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>>> We have two functions for adding a page to a bio, __bio_add_page() which is
>>> used to add a single page to a freshly created b
o_add_folio_nofail
commit: 42205551d1d43b1b42942fb7ef023cf954136cea
[19/20] fs: iomap: use bio_add_folio_nofail where possible
commit: f31c58ab3ddaf64503d7988197602d7443d5be37
[20/20] block: mark bio_add_folio as __must_check
commit: 9320744e4dbe10df6059b2b6531946c200a0ba3b
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
as __must_check so we don't have to go again
> and audit all callers.
Looks fine to me, though it would be nice if the fs and dm people could
give this a quick look. Should not take long, any empty bio addition
should, by definition, be able to use a non-checked page addition for
the first page.
--
Jens Axboe
ong
>>
>> Changes to v1:
>> - Removed pointless comment pointed out by Willy
>> - Changed commit messages pointed out by Damien
>> - Colledted Damien's Reviews and Acks
>
> Jens any comments on this?
I'll take a look post -rc1.
--
Jens Axboe
13 matches
Mail list logo
