Hi,
Now pushed to the -nmw git tree. Thanks,
Steve.
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 10:58 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> When unmounting, gfs2 does a full dlm_unlock operation on every
> cached lock. This can create a very large amount of work and can
> take a long time to complete. However, the vast ma
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:44:36AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > - save 64 bytes of memory for every local lock
> > (32 in gfs2_glock, 32 in dlm_rsb)
> >
> > - save 96 bytes of memory for every remote lock
> > (32 in gfs2_glock, 32 in local dlm_rsb, 32 in remote dlm_lkb)
> >
> > - save
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 10:30 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:45:17AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > > + if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
> > > + (!gl->gl_lvb[0] || gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) {
> > I'm still not happy with using !gl->
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 09:45:17AM +, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> > + if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
> > + (!gl->gl_lvb[0] || gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) {
> I'm still not happy with using !gl->gl_lvb[0] to determine whether the
> LVB is in use or not. I think
Hi,
On Thu, 2012-11-08 at 16:34 -0500, David Teigland wrote:
> When unmounting, gfs2 does a full dlm_unlock operation on every
> cached lock. This can create a very large amount of work and can
> take a long time to complete. However, the vast majority of these
> dlm unlock operations are unnece
