Hi Bob,
On 13/01/17 20:26, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi Andy,
I debugged all this. Here is a replacement patch for the bug you
found in my patch, and I'll post three others shortly, for the
bug(s) I found in testing it. All I changed, really was: I added:
"*sane && " to the if.
Bob Peterson
---
This
- Original Message -
| Hi Bob,
|
| On 13/01/17 13:40, Bob Peterson wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > This patch changes the checks done on the rindex file. Before, if
| > the rindex addresses weren't perfectly aligned and equally spaced,
| > it considered the rindex not sane. However, in most cases i
- Original Message -
| Hi Bob,
|
| On 13/01/17 13:40, Bob Peterson wrote:
| > Hi,
| >
| > This patch changes the checks done on the rindex file. Before, if
| > the rindex addresses weren't perfectly aligned and equally spaced,
| > it considered the rindex not sane. However, in most cases i
Hi Bob,
On 13/01/17 13:40, Bob Peterson wrote:
Hi,
This patch changes the checks done on the rindex file. Before, if
the rindex addresses weren't perfectly aligned and equally spaced,
it considered the rindex not sane. However, in most cases it should
be sane. Rather than flag this as a violati
