Once again...thank you.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:46 +1000, Saul Lethbridge wrote:
> > Doesn't appear to work!
>
> you code, no. once I fixed it, it does.
>
> compile with:
>
> gcc -Wall \
>`pkg-config --cflags
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 08:43 +, Neil Roberts wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 03:29 -0500, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
> > Le jeudi 13 novembre 2008 à 15:09 +0800, 韦锴 a écrit :
> > > CLUTTER_ACTOR_IS_REACTIVE (actor), it is neither TRUE nor FALSE in
> > > glib 's definition.
> >
> > If you look at
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 20:46 +1000, Saul Lethbridge wrote:
> Doesn't appear to work!
you code, no. once I fixed it, it does.
compile with:
gcc -Wall \
`pkg-config --cflags clutter-0.9 clutter-gtk-0.9` \
-o test-viewport \
`pkg-config --libs clutter-0.9 clutter-gtk-0.9` \
Doesn't appear to work!
#include
#include
#include
int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
ClutterTimeline *timeline;
ClutterActor*stage, *viewport, *tex, *tex2, *group;
ClutterColor stage_color = { 0x61, 0x64, 0x8c, 0xff };
GtkWidget *window, *embed;
GtkWidget *ta
Hi,
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
gboolean exists because there are no booleans in C as in C++.
Well, actually, it has been almost 10 years now that a boolean type exists
in C. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 03:29 -0500, Pierre-Luc Beaudoin wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 novembre 2008 à 15:09 +0800, 韦锴 a écrit :
> > CLUTTER_ACTOR_IS_REACTIVE (actor), it is neither TRUE nor FALSE in
> > glib 's definition.
>
> If you look at the definition of TRUE, you'll find out that it is
> !FALSE, and
Le jeudi 13 novembre 2008 à 15:09 +0800, 韦锴 a écrit :
> CLUTTER_ACTOR_IS_REACTIVE (actor), it is neither TRUE nor FALSE in
> glib 's definition.
If you look at the definition of TRUE, you'll find out that it is
!FALSE, and you'll find out that FALSE is 0. Therefore, comparing
CLUTTER_ACTOR_IS_REA
