Re: [clutter] Are C++ bindings still alive?

2008-04-11 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:44 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Giacomo Graziosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's still me. This time I'm asking some infos on C++ bindings. Looks like they are in worst conditions than Ruby's ones. Maybe I should focus on some

Re: [clutter] Are C++ bindings still alive?

2008-04-11 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 13:44 -0500, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Giacomo Graziosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's still me. This time I'm asking some infos on C++ bindings. Looks like they are in worst conditions than Ruby's ones. Maybe I should focus on some

[clutter] Are C++ bindings still alive?

2008-04-10 Thread Giacomo Graziosi
It's still me. This time I'm asking some infos on C++ bindings. Looks like they are in worst conditions than Ruby's ones. Maybe I should focus on some other language right now rather than hoping to use my favourite languages :-). -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]