On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:49 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 19:48 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
So this is a question for the Clutter developers. Are we really meant to
connect to ClutterTimeline's completed signal just so we can unref the
timeline and any behaviours
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:20 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
By the way, I don't really see the point of ClutterAlpha in the public
API, unless you are planning to add more functions to it. At the moment
it seems like behaviours could just take the alpha callback, and that
alpha callback could
2007/12/14, Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 14:17 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 11:51 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
this would become needlessly complicated if we passed the same
function
and then the same timeline, for instance (fantasy
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 11:51 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 12:20 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
By the way, I don't really see the point of ClutterAlpha in the public
API, unless you are planning to add more functions to it. At the moment
it seems like behaviours could
