On 7/25/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-07-25 14:46-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
It also slaves the release cycles of unrelated modules to each other.
[...]
True. That is the whole point. I believe the concerns you have expressed
are the standard concerns for the
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 7/25/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 17:40 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
If someone is using GTK2 I've created a nice Module too. But it isn't
used at WengoPhone at the moment and I'm not a Gnome guy. Maybe someone
else wants
Oooops, when I looked at the file all I could see were hardcoded paths.
sorry for the noise,
-Mathieu
On 7/26/07, Andreas Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
On 7/25/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 17:40 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 08:54, Mike Jackson wrote:
...
I will throw my hat in the ring on this one.. Eclipse with CDT:
Available on Unix/Linux/OS X/Windows
Uses GNU Tool Chain by default
OpenSource
Updated Regularly
Uses Makefiles by default so basically CMake supports it.
We would be
On 7/26/07, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I didn't realize that the cmake program did any of the work
when running 'make'. I thought 'cmake' was executed only when
producing (or rebuilding) the Makefiles, and otherwise was completely
out of the picture when the user invokes
I have a visual studio project that creates an exe. Even after the
exe is linked and up to date, the next build will relink the exe.
I'm trying to determine if this is a configuration issue, or a cmake
issue. Has anybody else seen this behavior?
Thanks,
Jon
On Thursday 26 July 2007 12:59, Christian Convey wrote:
...
So Alex provided this command-line:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_COMPONENT=Headers -P cmake_install.cmake
I've seen DESTDIR=... used with make install. Can I safely use it
(with the expected results) with the cmake command? For example:
On 7/26/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-07-26 12:32-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
So why will the experimental testing method be widely used? And when
it is used, why will people report their results?
This is standard fare in most free software releases these days. To
On 2007-07-26 12:32-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/26/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it really boils down to this. If the developers from KitWare are
serious
about getting widespread testing of modules before they are made part of
an
official CMake release, then they
On 7/26/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:58, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi Alex,
Wouldn't the command:
cmake
On 7/26/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:58, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi Alex,
Wouldn't the command:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_COMPONENT=Headers -P cmake_install.cmake
overwrite the very makefiles that are executing that command? If so,
No, -P means
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:58, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi Alex,
Wouldn't the command:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_COMPONENT=Headers -P cmake_install.cmake
overwrite the very makefiles that are executing that command? If so,
No, -P means cmake will just execute the given cmake script, i.e. it
Hi Alex,
Wouldn't the command:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_COMPONENT=Headers -P cmake_install.cmake
overwrite the very makefiles that are executing that command? If so,
does that mess up the state of the Make process that's invoking the
cmake command shown above?
I'm thinking that in order to
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:25, Christian Convey wrote:
I'd like make install to install different (named) subsets of files,
depending on my needs. For example, make output=header-files
install or make output=libraries install.
Is what I'm trying to accomplish even possible?
Yes.
You need
Camek, Alexander a écrit :
Hi Alex,
In my configure.h.cmake: #cmakedefine SYSTEM_NAME In my
...
Did you have a look at ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} ?
Yes I had, but when I write in the configure.h.cmake #cmakedefine
${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} then the result after the configure_file is this:
Hi List,
First of all thanks for your help and the good job you do here.
I have following problem. I want to create a file which is configured during
cmake time.
That is no problem up to now I have all what I need execept one thing.
I need the name of the plattform. How do I solve that
,
So, I have to jump in and say something about pkg-config. It simply
can not be relied on to be there by CMake. It is not a default package
on any commercial UNIX, and many tools like QT do not require it to be
installed. It is just another place to look for things.
-Bill
On Jul 26, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:47, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing
rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++
Does anyone have a simple gettext example being used with cmake?
I'm looking for something to automate both the .cpp - .po conversion
and merging as well as the .po - .mo creation.
--
Gonzalo Garramuño
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMD4400 - ASUS48N-E
GeForce7300GT
Kubuntu Edgy
On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:47, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
As far as I can tell,
On 7/26/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von protein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
Probably not unless you write such a generator. The
Zitat von Olivier Delannoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 7/26/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zitat von protein [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
On 7/25/07, protein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since Dev C++ is a nice free IDE in windows and is developing rapidly.
Is it possible that one day cmake will support Dev C++ project file
generation?
As far as I can tell, interest in Dev C++ has waned because its
development has gotten stale.
On 2007-07-26 18:35-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7/26/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-07-26 13:55-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
I think it is very important that any experimental releases have no
effect on official CMake installations at all.
That's already been
On 2007-07-26 13:55-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
I think it is very important that any experimental releases have no
effect on official CMake installations at all.
That's already been stated. I say again, you will not be affected by this
proposal at all.
Alan
__
On 7/26/07, Christian Convey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/07, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 26 July 2007 11:58, Christian Convey wrote:
Hi Alex,
Wouldn't the command:
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_COMPONENT=Headers -P cmake_install.cmake
overwrite the very
On 2007-07-26 03:20-0400 Brandon Van Every wrote:
I'll stick to whatever the official CMake version
number guarantees.
That's fine since in my scheme the official modules would be released
exactly as now and you can go on exactly as before.
[out of order] Since I have no faith in the
Thanks to all.
Yes I had, but when I write in the configure.h.cmake #cmakedefine
${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} then the result after the configure_file is
this: /* #undef Windows */.
You have to do:
#cmakedefine CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME
But I think you want this:
#define THE_SYSTEM_NAME
On Thursday 26 July 2007 10:43, you wrote:
Hi Alex,
In my configure.h.cmake: #cmakedefine SYSTEM_NAME In my
CMakeLists.txt: CHECK(system SYSTEM_NAME)
CONFIGURE_FILE(configure.h.cmake
configure.h)
Is something like this possible?
Did you have a look at
Hello!
I am porting large legacy project to cmake build system. For some
reason I need to completely clear INCLUDE_DIRECTORIES and rebuild them
from scratch at some stage of CMakeLists.txt. Is it possible now ?
Thanks
___
CMake mailing list
On 7/25/07, Hendrik Sattler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 17:40 schrieb Andreas Schneider:
If someone is using GTK2 I've created a nice Module too. But it isn't
used at WengoPhone at the moment and I'm not a Gnome guy. Maybe someone
else wants to take and maintain it.
On 7/26/07, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it really boils down to this. If the developers from KitWare are serious
about getting widespread testing of modules before they are made part of an
official CMake release, then they will test the modules with separate
well-publicized
Hi Alex,
In my configure.h.cmake: #cmakedefine SYSTEM_NAME In my
CMakeLists.txt: CHECK(system SYSTEM_NAME)
CONFIGURE_FILE(configure.h.cmake
configure.h)
Is something like this possible?
Did you have a look at ${CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME} ?
Yes I had, but when I
At 7/26/2007 09:07 AM, gga wrote:
Does anyone have a simple gettext example being used with cmake?
I wrote such framework for KWWidgets (http://kwwidgets.org)
It is pretty hairy though, but I added a fair amount of comments.
Check this directory:
On 7/26/07, Jon W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a visual studio project that creates an exe. Even after the
exe is linked and up to date, the next build will relink the exe.
I'm trying to determine if this is a configuration issue, or a cmake
issue. Has anybody else seen this behavior?
35 matches
Mail list logo
