Hi there,
While trying to compile my project in shared libs I realized it was
not compiling any more with the free C++ toolkit 2003. Looking at
Windows-cl.cmake the only difference I can see is that each MD flags
was changed to a MT.
So I decided to give it a try with the VCExpress/Nmake one,
Sebastien BARRE wrote:
OK, back to PARENT_SCOPE. Well, Tcl/Tk has 'upvar' (which RAISE_SCOPE
was inspired from), *and* 'global', which would pretty much declare
variables inside a procedure/function to be of the "global scope"
nature. I don't really like any of them. If I had to give a (crazy)
At 2/16/2008 03:48 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
Would
RAISE_SCOPE(var1 var2 ... varN)
be better ?
Why was the syntax changed from that to
RAISE_SCOPE(varname value) ?
(which was basically a set() and that's why converted to
set(... PARENT_SCOPE) )
Sorry, I missed the fact that RAISE_SCOPE ha
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
On 2008-02-16 12:38-0500 Bill Hoffman wrote:
[...]parallel ctest is on the todo list for this year. Most likely
it will be ctest -j N. We can not depend on the make system to do
the parallel stuff, and ctest -j would be useful for all generators.
That's excellent new
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Sebastien BARRE wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
...
> Hey guys,
...
> Obviously foo is not set, since it is now set in SET_VAR2 scope. Bummer.
> So now I have to do things like this:
>
> FUNCTION(SET_VAR2 varname)
>SET_VAR1(varname_proxy)
>SET(${varname} ${varname_proxy
At 2/16/2008 02:13 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> I don't mean to remove the SET(PARENT_SCOPE) feature, where the main
> purpose is to set a global variable from within a function.
> But if SET( ... PARENT_SCOPE) is called outside a function, the effect is
> that the variable is set in the par
On 2008-02-16 12:38-0500 Bill Hoffman wrote:
[...]parallel ctest is on the todo list for this year. Most likely it
will be ctest -j N. We can not depend on the make system to do the parallel
stuff, and ctest -j would be useful for all generators.
That's excellent news! The execution of t
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 16 February 2008, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> > Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 January 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >> set(foo a b c PARENT_SCOPE)
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure it is a good idea that this al
David Cole wrote:
Parallel tests are only going to be possible if you can guarantee that
all tests are independent of all other tests, or if you specify explicit
dependencies between tests somehow. (Which would introduce the same sort
of complexity you complain about above for build steps..
On 2/15/08, Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, I may be leaping to conclusions here, but it appears from what you
> have said that it is a reasonable hypothesis that the ctest commmand works
> through the cmake generator backend.
True
When that is "make" (the default for
> Unix
Hi,
I have a project set up where I genererate optimized/debug libraries
depending on the build type. In the debug build, a 'd' postfix is
added with CMAKE_DEBUG_POSTFIX. However, when building the unit tests
from the same project tree, the updated link library is not detected
and hence the unit t
On Saturday 16 February 2008, Bill Hoffman wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > On Friday 18 January 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
...
> >> set(foo a b c PARENT_SCOPE)
> >>
> >> I'm not sure it is a good idea that this also propagates to the parent
> >> directory. What is a use case for this ?
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Friday 18 January 2008, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
Again, I think this behaviour is a quite unintuitive and should be
well documented, at least.
I shall add that at first
On Friday 18 January 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Friday 18 January 2008, Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
> > Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
> > > Again, I think this behaviour is a quite unintuitive and should be
> > > well documented, at least.
> >
> > I shall add that at first I expe
14 matches
Mail list logo
