Arlen Cox wrote:
Thanks Mike.
That was exactly what I was looking for.
-Arlen
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You may want to look at the
file(GLOB variable [RELATIVE path] [globbing expressions]...)
or
file(GLOB_RECURSE variable [RELATIVE path]
Would it solve my problem if (in my case) I set HAS_UUID_H to NOTFOUND?
On 02/03/2008, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
The use case here is more like:
- run CMake:
check_include_file(uuid/uuid.h HAS_UUID_H)
if(not HAS_UUID_H) -- Fatal error +
I guess the following would suit your needs too:
# AUX_SOURCE_DIRECTORY: Find all source files in a directory.
AUX_SOURCE_DIRECTORY(dir VARIABLE)
Collects the names of all the source files in the specified directory
and stores the list in the variable provided. This command is intended
Bill Hoffman wrote:
James Mansion wrote:
So, C++ is the language we picked/like. You are welcome to contribute
one in C++. Imagine if you could develop generators (I assume that is
what you mean by emitters) in any language! You wouldn't even be able
to share them.
Bill, I like C++ as much
James Mansion wrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
James Mansion wrote:
So, C++ is the language we picked/like. You are welcome to contribute
one in C++. Imagine if you could develop generators (I assume that is
what you mean by emitters) in any language! You wouldn't even be able
to share them.
Steven Van Ingelgem wrote:
Would it solve my problem if (in my case) I set HAS_UUID_H to NOTFOUND?
No, I could not find a way to remove or change the cache entry. If you
want to use a compiler check like this, you option would be to copy the
check_include_file macro into your project and
At 3/2/2008 09:10 AM, James Mansion, wrote:
If I have a project that is largely in a more convenient language -
whether Java or Python or C# (or even Lua) - and it has material
components in C++ for performance or reuse reasons, then it is
clearly reasonable to ship something that can make a
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:10 AM, James Mansion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I suppose you don't have to use CMake. Perhaps scons would be a
better fit for your tastes.
In a Python-based system, yes.
But if I have a C++ code and a variety of value added components aimed
at
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the quick interruption, but somehow I have the feeling this
discussion will start again and again and again, if it has ever appeared
to end. Here are my two cents...
IMHO there might be a misunderstanding concerning Kitware's CMake
strategy: It is a domain specific
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Reinhold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
Sorry for the quick interruption, but somehow I have the feeling this
discussion will start again and again and again, if it has ever appeared
to end. Here are my two cents...
IMHO there might be a
Hi,
I have created a CPack installation via make package... It's like 3M
big, when I run the installation wizard, I select a different
directory, and the wizard says it'll take 8M on my hard drive... I
install it, but it creates just usr/bin (the directories) inside the
destination directory...
Hi,
I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports
CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems
promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under
CodeBlocks 8.02.
However, running the program (which is a command line program) from
http://raven.rubyforge.org/
O'Reilly OnJava.com has a recent article introducing Raven, a JRuby
based build tool for Java.
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The article is very intro. It doesn't demonstrate any payoffs for
using Ruby
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The comments following this article are interesting. For instance, on syntax:
This is just stupid. The Ruby syntax is
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The comments following this article are
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Félix C. Morency [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports
CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems
promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under
CodeBlocks
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 5:53 AM, Anteru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problems:
* I want to name my debug libraries with a trailing 'd'. I use
SET_TARGET_PROPERTIES(MyTarget PROPERTIES DEBUG_POSTFIX d) to do this.
However, MyTarget is a unit-test runner and I want to execute it using
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/buildr/
A review of Buildr
http://danielroop.com/blog/2007/08/25/buildr-review/#more-50
Says that Buildr is
Thanks for the fast answers :)
I can't seem to use this solution, as i have different files that I include
or not, depending on the platform.
So i guess the good way would be to link all this together.
Here's where I'm stuck :
I try to use TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES to in the darkness bind them
19 matches
Mail list logo
