Hi
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 1:48 , Bart wrote:
Thanks for those suggestions, I was on that path, but I can not get it to
work properly:
foo$ cmake .
-- Configuring done
-- Generating done
-- Build files have been written to: /home/bart/foo
foo$ make
Scanning dependencies of target foo
When I build a RPM with current CVS CMAKE/CPack for project
projectname
the file name of the generated rpm is:
projectname-version-Linux.rpm
The common filename for an rpm is
projectname-version-release-architecture.rpm
Putting Linux in the file name doesn't provide much information
2009/12/30 Winfried Dobbe winfried_...@xmsnet.nl:
When I build a RPM with current CVS CMAKE/CPack for project projectname
the file name of the generated rpm is:
projectname-version-Linux.rpm
The common filename for an rpm is
projectname-version-release-architecture.rpm
Putting Linux in
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Guilherme Balena Versiani wrote:
Hello all,
FindRuby.cmake from CMake 2.8.0 does not support Ruby 1.9.1, and has some
errors on variable RUBY_NODOT_VERSION (it wasn't created resulting in
_nothing_ in expansions). It follows attached a patch to be applied to
2009/12/30 Talin viri...@gmail.com:
I've got a problem that has been vexing me for several months: It seems that
when I create a custom rule using add_custom_command, the DEPENDS clause
sometimes works and sometimes doesn't, and I can't figure out why.
Here's what my custom rule looks like:
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 December 2009 23:16
To: Hicham Mouline
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Hicham Mouline hic...@mouline.org
wrote:
Hello,
I am
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 December 2009 23:16
To: Hicham Mouline
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Hicham
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles pgqui...@elpauer.org
wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
happen automagically. That was the whole point of this thread :-)
I would argue that FindXXX.cmake is the wrong place for the decision to
be
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
happen automagically. That was the whole point of this thread :-)
I would argue that
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:51:29 +0100, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes, Michael is right: I want it to
happen
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 18:02 , Jed Brown wrote:
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:51:29 +0100, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 17:32 , Jed Brown wrote:
On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 12:29:05 +0100, Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgqui...@elpauer.org wrote:
I'm using CMake 2.8.0 on Linux. Yes,
-Original Message-
From: Michael Jackson [mailto:mike.jack...@bluequartz.net]
Sent: 30 December 2009 16:12
To: Hicham Mouline
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] cmake file in build directory
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote:
-Original Message-
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Talin wrote:
What's the recommended way in CMake to do automated dependency generation
for languages that aren't directly supported by CMake? Suppose my compiler
generates an output file which contains a list of all the source files that
were used to make it, and
I guess what I am asking is - if I modified my build script to generate a
text file (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt or whatever) containing the
dependencies, would CMake be able to use it? I know that with GNU makefiles
there is a way to generate additional makefiles as part of the build process
Hi,
Can the /VERSION:... flag in Linker/General only be added through
compiler-specific options for vs2008 in a cmake file?
Rds,
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
On 2009-12-30 10:42-0800 Talin wrote:
I guess what I am asking is - if I modified my build script to generate a
text file (Makefile, CMakeLists.txt or whatever) containing the
dependencies, would CMake be able to use it? I know that with GNU makefiles
there is a way to generate additional
I didn't quite understand.
Was there a workaround (besides setting the /openmp flag manually) ?
Rds,
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
That is more along the lines of what I was looking for. Thanks! :)
One further question: Using the technique you describe, the dependency file
will need to be regenerated each time a source file changes - i.e. if I add
a new import statement to a source file, the list of dependencies will
change,
Hi
found the problem... Too much quoting, I'm sorry for that.
See below
Michael
On 30. Dec, 2009, at 21:41 , Bart wrote:
Hi Michael,
I'm not quite sure if I'm getting the list building right, since if I add an
extra source
file to the project, it generates the int and long files, but
On 2009-12-30 12:30-0800 Talin wrote:
That is more along the lines of what I was looking for. Thanks! :)
One further question: Using the technique you describe, the dependency file
will need to be regenerated each time a source file changes - i.e. if I add
a new import statement to a source
20 matches
Mail list logo