Hi,everyone!
I'm trying using CMAKE to complie a CUDA_SDK example:nbody;Of course I have
noticed that Brian J. Davis wrote a article nameCUDA,CMAKE,and an attempt to
build nbodyat CMAKE maillist in Jan 25 2010.I followed his advice and can
build and run the executable,but the particles do not
Hi all,
here is what I did now:
I created an installer image (BitRock installer in our case) containing
the normal deliverables of our software plus the following items:
- Some scripts needed to carry out our tests. This also contains
software needed to carry out the tests (Squish)
- A complete
The problem above is reported almost a year ago:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-July/030870.html
but it's still there (at least with 2.8.1 stable build). Any hint is
this going to be fixed or not?
Regards.
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
On 16. Jul, 2009, at 11:45 , Vardan Akopian wrote:
Hello,
I'm using cmake 2.6.2.
While trying to use the FindLAPACK module on a Linux system which has
ATLAS installed I stumbled upon a problem where the BLAS libraries
would not be found. By digging into FindBLAS.cmake I discovered that
Hello
Sadly, I just can`t figure out why Cmake can`t find the 64bit-compiler
installed by Windows7.1SDK for use with VC2010Express.
In the meantime I switched back to VS2008Express + Windows6.1SDK (with a few
hacks to use that included 64bit-compiler).
Cmake does a fine job when
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to correct a thing: cblas_dgemm is NOT an implementation detail, it is
part of CBLAS which is the official C-interface to BLAS.
I think implementation detail mentioned in the OP message was not
about CBLAS per se, but
On 2. Jun, 2010, at 15:09 , Crni Gorac wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to correct a thing: cblas_dgemm is NOT an implementation detail, it is
part of CBLAS which is the official C-interface to BLAS.
I think implementation detail
[Sorry if this message is posted twice, but first was before I subscribed to
the list, so I'm not sure it was not rejected]
Hi,
[using cmake 2.8.1]
I have a project where almost every sub-dirs should be cross-compiled
(arm-linux-gnuueabi-gcc), but one directory containing a tool which must
I am porting a library over to cmake.
This library is built both shared and static AND has several composite
objects that get linked in.
For example,
subdir-a had makefile that compiled and linked a1.c a2.c into ../a.o
top directory linked in a.o into it's libs (shared and static)
I have
Is there anything to add to a target after it is declared?
For example,
add_library(foo STATIC foo1.c foo2.c)
add_some_more(foo foo3.c)
or
add_some_more(foo foo3.o)
If not, feasibility on how it could be implemented?
Thanks,
Doug
___
Powered
On 2. Jun, 2010, at 16:34 , Doug Reiland wrote:
Is there anything to add to a target after it is declared?
For example,
add_library(foo STATIC foo1.c foo2.c)
add_some_more(foo foo3.c)
or
add_some_more(foo foo3.o)
If not, feasibility on how it could be implemented?
HTTP submit method
Drop
site:http://testing.psychiatry.uiowa.edu/CDash/submit.php?project=BRAINS3
Upload file:
/scratch/kent/BT/BRAINS-COMPILE/Darwin/DEBUG-build/BRAINS3-build/src-build/Testing/20100602-0500/Build.xml
to
http://testing.psychiatry.uiowa.edu/CDash/submit.php?project
Is it possible to implement a list of lists. The following example
shows cmake ending up with a list with 6 elements instead of
a list with 2 elements with each element being a list with 3 elements
set(fooa 1 2 3)
set(foob a b c)
message(${fooa})
message(${fooa})
message(${foob})
list(APPEND foos
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:24:44 am Doug Reiland wrote:
Is it possible to implement a list of lists. The following example
shows cmake ending up with a list with 6 elements instead of
a list with 2 elements with each element being a list with 3 elements
set(fooa 1 2 3)
set(foob a b c)
Am Mittwoch 02 Juni 2010, 18:34:56 schrieb Clinton Stimpson:
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:24:44 am Doug Reiland wrote:
Is it possible to implement a list of lists. The following example
shows cmake ending up with a list with 6 elements instead of
a list with 2 elements with each element
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 11:02:18 am Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 02 Juni 2010, 18:34:56 schrieb Clinton Stimpson:
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:24:44 am Doug Reiland wrote:
Is it possible to implement a list of lists. The following example
shows cmake ending up with a list with
perfect, thankyou!
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Clinton Stimpson clin...@elemtech.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:24:44 am Doug Reiland wrote:
Is it possible to implement a list of lists. The following example
shows cmake ending up with a list with 6 elements instead of
a list
It all goes back to how a current Makefile for a library is setup.
I need a shared and static version of library.
The library includes some objects built my sub-directories. In those
sub-directories, there are unique compile flags, generated files, ...
In the past, those sub-directories would
Sorry for another newbie question.
Say, to setup a variable as follow so ${build-dir} doesn't get expanded
set(foo \${build-dir}/foo.c)
How would a expand foo so ${build-dir} gets expanded?
The following don't seem to do it.
message(${foo})
message(${${foo}})
On 06/02/2010 08:37 PM, Doug Reiland wrote:
Sorry for another newbie question.
Say, to setup a variable as follow so ${build-dir} doesn't get expanded
set(foo \${build-dir}/foo.c)
How would a expand foo so ${build-dir} gets expanded?
STRING(REPLACE \${build-dir} xyz foo ${foo})
Regards,
Ralph Barth will be out of the office starting 03.06.2010 and will be
returning on 07.06.2010.
Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
Deutsche Börse Systems AG
Chairman of the Supervisory
On 06/02/2010 10:24 PM, Doug Reiland wrote:
Is there anyway to do in a generic fashion?
For example, I don't know what all the variables are.
I can be certain that they are valid, for example build-dir is set in scope.
However, the string can have several variables in it.
The following
22 matches
Mail list logo
