The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11301
==
Reported By:Marco Martin
Assigned To:
On 06.10.10 22:47:15, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Hi,
The documentation says
A package-specific list of components may be listed after the REQUIRED
option or after the COMPONENTS option if no REQUIRED option is given.
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#command:find_package
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 2:33 , Jashank Jeremy wrote:
Hi,
I have a Texinfo file in my project, and I'd like to tie it in with my
CMake build. How do I do so?
Jashank
find_program(MAKEINFO_EXECUTABLE makeinfo)
set(info_in ${CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR}/bla.texi)
set(info_out
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 4:58 , Travis Jensen wrote:
I'm trying to build a project using cmake (firebreath). I am stuck at a
particular point (details later). I can build other projects without
running into this problem. Other people can build firebreath without
running into this problem. The
On 6. Oct, 2010, at 20:10 , aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com
aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Hi all.
Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like to
prevent it before any cruft is written into the source tree. I
experimented with writing a function
Hi all,
As mentioned in my previous post, there is a bug in the cmake module
FindwxWidgets.cmake that prevents any library using wxWidgets to cross
compile for Windows from Linux. Lines 192 to 198 are concerned by this bug:
IF(WIN32 AND NOT CYGWIN AND NOT MSYS)
SET(wxWidgets_FIND_STYLE win32)
How can I have CMake not build test targets when doing a make install?
I'd prefer that test targets are only ever built if make test is called.
--
edA-qa mort-ora-y
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
BigTPoker - Poker fun and games
is there an easy way to clean out a source tree if an in-source
build was accidentally kicked off? (short of dividing the files by
their timestamp and removing the newer ones, etc..)
My immediate thought was, does make clean not work for you? But I
guess you're talking about CMake debris
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 10:54 , edA-qa mort-ora-y wrote:
How can I have CMake not build test targets when doing a make install?
I'd prefer that test targets are only ever built if make test is called.
--
edA-qa mort-ora-y
That needs a bit of trickery:
function(add_test_executable name)
On 07/10/10 10:21, fat...@crackmonkey.us wrote:
Then, to clear all CMake debris:
rm -r projectx/cmake/*
On Unix, if a project is managed by SVN it's easy to clean tree from
generated files:
$ svn-clean
Distributed with Debian, Ubuntu, etc. as well as downloadable [1]
I'm sure there are
Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable
to disable progress printout.
At the moment building with only minor changes prints a lot of text
with CMake Makefiles.
eg:
[ 4%] Built target bf_intern_audaspace
[ 4%] Built target bf_intern_string
[ 6%] Built target
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable
to disable progress printout.
At the moment building with only minor changes prints a lot of text
with CMake Makefiles.
eg:
[ 4%] Built target bf_intern_audaspace
Hi,I've tried to include assembler-files in one of my projects and with the
masm-rule I have included the sourcefiles like normal c++-files in my library
and enabled masm-support. But when I generate the visual studio 2010 solution
the files are included without a custom command to compile the
On 10/07/2010 11:28 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
function(add_test_executable name)
add_executable(${name} EXCLUDE_FROM_ALL ${ARGN})
if(NOT TARGET test-exes)
add_custom_target(test-exes)
endif()
add_dependencies(test-exes ${name})
endfunction()
add_custom_target(check
COMMAND
I've got a reasonably big project with 30+ shared libraries and 70+
executables all in one cmake-based project. Today I changed one line in
a CMakeLists.txt in a sub-directory to link boost program_options in one
particular executable, and it caused cmake to decide that it needed to
recompile
On 10/7/2010 8:21 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote:
I've got a reasonably big project with 30+ shared libraries and 70+
executables all in one cmake-based project. Today I changed one line in
a CMakeLists.txt in a sub-directory to link boost program_options in one
particular executable, and it
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:19 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6. Oct, 2010, at 20:10 , aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com
aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Hi all.
Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like to
prevent it before any cruft
Two things: You should have your source code under version control,
for many reasons, but in this context:
1. The VC system can tell you which files are unknown to it, i.e.
those CMake pooped all over your source tree.
2. You can make sure your work is checked in, then delete the source
On Sunday 22 August 2010 22:11:28 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
CMake supports Java, but that support is ... needs some work, there are
some issues (I think this had to do with the location of the compiled
files and the java packages or something).
I assume patches to improve the situation would
On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote:
My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This generator
works on the class files. The class files aren't in
CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR they are located in:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Clifford Yapp cliffy...@gmail.com wrote:
I use $(MAKE) in my BUILD_COMMAND and that seems to do OK, although I
don't know if it works universally.
That's an environment variable, as near as I can tell and isn't
mentioned in the current CMake documentation. So
On 10/7/2010 11:25 AM, kent williams wrote:
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Clifford Yappcliffy...@gmail.com wrote:
I use $(MAKE) in my BUILD_COMMAND and that seems to do OK, although I
don't know if it works universally.
That's an environment variable, as near as I can tell and isn't
1. Is that $(MAKE) or is it ${MAKE} ? One thing missing from the
CMake documentation -- unless I'm mistaken there's not much
explanation of CMake syntax in the documentation.
2. I think it's probably not what one intends to have 'make -j4' (for
example) used every time make is invoked. If you
If you use $(MAKE) in a BUILD_COMMAND, then the literal $(MAKE) appears
in the generated makefiles.
That tells the top level make to spawn sub-makes with the job controller
from the top level make.
Then you do not need to specify any -j flags anywhere except at the top
level.
And then, the top
On the other hand, with Visual Studio, it's all a big hairy mess.
because the setting for how many parallel projects to build simultaneously
is a single top level global setting. So when we spawn sub-VS instances in
VS 2008, for example, each one uses N for its parallel setting.
In that case,
On 10/7/2010 11:52 AM, kent williams wrote:
1. Is that $(MAKE) or is it ${MAKE} ? One thing missing from the
CMake documentation -- unless I'm mistaken there's not much
explanation of CMake syntax in the documentation.
No, this is make syntax not CMake syntax.
2. I think it's probably not
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
What you want is for make to treat the external projects just like any other
library or executable in a build.
so, if you run this at the top of the build:
make -j4
It should run at most 4 concurrent things at
On 10/7/2010 12:13 PM, kent williams wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
What you want is for make to treat the external projects just like any other
library or executable in a build.
so, if you run this at the top of the build:
make -j4
It
On 10/07/2010 09:57 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote:
My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This generator
works on the class files. The class files aren't in
CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR they are located in:
Yeah, I think I'll go with something like what you are saying. I wonder
if I can remove the CMakeFiles directory and the CMakeCache.txt file
from within the CMakeLists script...
Aaron C. Meadows
Hi all.
Is there a good way to disallow in-source builds? Ideally, I'd like
to
prevent
On 10/7/2010 12:37 PM, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
On 10/07/2010 09:57 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 16:45:49 Andreas Schneider wrote:
My current problem is with javah (C header file generator). This
generator
works on the class files. The class files aren't in
You could try, though it makes my brain hurt to think about it. Why
go to such lengths to protect users from themselves?
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:57 AM, aaron.mead...@thomsonreuters.com wrote:
Yeah, I think I'll go with something like what you are saying. I wonder
if I can remove the
On Thursday 07 October 2010 18:57:50 Bill Hoffman wrote:
The java support was broken a while ago when we re-organized the build
trees. I don't have much time to work on this, but I would like to get
it fixed. The best approach might be a pure custom command approach.
Hi Bill,
with some
On 10/7/2010 2:37 PM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2010 18:57:50 Bill Hoffman wrote:
The java support was broken a while ago when we re-organized the build
trees. I don't have much time to work on this, but I would like to get
it fixed. The best approach might be a pure
On Thursday 07 October 2010 21:32:51 Bill Hoffman wrote:
The other issue is VS builds. At one point, I had some magic, cmake
language to custom command converter thing going for this, but I am
thinking it might be broken. If we did a pure custom-command version,
it would work in the IDE's
I just posted a short blog article demonstrating how to figure out the
number of processors available for a make -j or a scripted ctest_build
call (with the Unix Makefiles generator) on Linux, Mac and Windows. Please
let me know if you have any ideas for how it might be improved or extended.
I'd rather make it as hard as possible to form bad habits. It would also be
helpful to me. I've moved to the console and typed cmake . several times
thinking I was in the build directory, and then cussed quite a bit while
digging through removing cruft. (Points on Version Control taken, I'll
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton ideasma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote:
Hi, I was wondering if this is possible or if it would be acceptable
to disable progress
tried that, no go
On Tue 05 Oct 21:44 2010 John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:41 PM, e...@cs.bgu.ac.il e...@cs.bgu.ac.il wrote:
nope, like I wrote in the first post, I need a string spinbox so I've
extended qspinbox to support strings.
that is the custom widget in question.
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Campbell Barton ideasma...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton ideasma...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7. Oct, 2010, at 11:58 , Campbell Barton wrote:
Hi, I was
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Mark Moll mm...@rice.edu wrote:
On OS X, this command might be easier / faster:
sysctl -n hw.ncpu
On Oct 7, 2010, at 3:50 PM, David Cole wrote:
I just posted a short blog article demonstrating how to figure out the
number of processors available
Hi,
The FindwxWidget.cmake module in 2.8 is breaking the build of
MRIConvert [1] because it strips -D from the output of wx-config
--cxxflags.
Is this not a bug?
This question was asked here last October [2] but not answered.
Thanks,
-Steve
[1] http://lcni.uoregon.edu/~jolinda/MRIConvert/
Hi,
I used to use CMake v2.6 on Cygwin-1.7 to build codes for MIPS.
It works well and my scripts like:
- CMakeLists.txt start -
CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED(VERSION 2.6)
INCLUDE(CMakeForceCompiler)
SET(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME Generic)
# specify the cross compiler
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:55 PM, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Campbell Barton ideasma...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:48 PM, Campbell Barton ideasma...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 19b37e653d1e13b77e02e6f23bec87cda18d0a66 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via d99c2b95dcc5e8c5234312121dfa0a699bb3c30d (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 7143d44ef520df02e33ef23ceb57a3f4e99dbfb6 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 0fe364f8aa695630ab52dc5e07da186cc8b3ada2 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 94ed8dbe202db1ee68be2e768cbba2a97b8f755a (commit)
via
49 matches
Mail list logo
