On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
>> My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
>> similar to the platform checks. Actually, it looks like in the Git
>> repository of CMake, there is now some Clang-specific support:
>> http://git
Hello,
I want to generate dynamic executables/setup packages after CMake and CTest
are completed successfully.
Is there a simple way to doing so or is the correct way to check the return
value from cmake and ctest?
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
NoRulez
__
Dear all,
I'm a newbie of cmake, and have some troubles in using the 'include'
command. I've already include the searching path into the env veriable PATH.
But each time running cmake, I always get follow error messages:
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt: xxx (include):
include could not find load
> You may try to use full RPATH:
> http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_RPATH_handling
>
> However I have 2 questions:
>
> 1) Is your ldd test done AFTER installing the .deb ?
>
> 2) Does the "not found" libraries belong to your CMake-handled project or
> to third party libraries?
Hi Eric,
Tha
On Monday 25 October 2010, Weiyu Yi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is Weiyu, a student from University of Germany. I have used
> CMake as the build system instead of autotool already for some
> projects. but I am still not sure about the way how the libraries
> dependencies should be handled, is there any
Hi All,
after moving from Visual Studio to Eclipse I realised that PRE_BUILD command
does not work as expected.
According to documentation:
'Note that the PRE_BUILD option is only supported on Visual Studio 7 or
later. For all other generators PRE_BUILD will be treated as PRE_LINK.'
I was supri
2010/10/25 Marcin Czenko :
> Hello everybody.
>
> I need your help to solve the following problem.
>
> The installed version of CMake is: 2.8.0.
> The installed version of CPack is: 2.8.0.
> I am running on Ubuntu LTS 10.04.
>
> I have a CMake project. The output of the project is an executable. T
On Oct 25, 2010, at 11:58 AM, kent williams wrote:
Like everyone else I started here to build my Qt app with CMake:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/BundleUtilitiesExample
Like a lot of things in CMake this involves copying a bunch of brittle
CMake code into your CMakeLists.txt, and seems like it has
Like everyone else I started here to build my Qt app with CMake:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/BundleUtilitiesExample
Like a lot of things in CMake this involves copying a bunch of brittle
CMake code into your CMakeLists.txt, and seems like it has too many
moving parts and failure points, but hey, we
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 17:14 , Tyler Roscoe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
>> On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it make more sense to use 'make -k' instead?
>>
>> Some weeks ago I also wanted to propose this, but then realized on
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 04:54:41PM +0200, Michael Wild wrote:
> On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
> > Wouldn't it make more sense to use 'make -k' instead?
>
> Some weeks ago I also wanted to propose this, but then realized one
> important drawback of -k: Say, you have target B dep
On 25. Oct, 2010, at 16:45 , Marcel Loose wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that 'ctest -DExperimentalBuild' returns with an exit status
> 0, even if compiler errors occur. I think that is caused by the fact
> that 'make -i' is used. The "-i|--ignore-errors" option causes make to
> always exit with
Hi all,
I noticed that 'ctest -DExperimentalBuild' returns with an exit status
0, even if compiler errors occur. I think that is caused by the fact
that 'make -i' is used. The "-i|--ignore-errors" option causes make to
always exit with status 0.
Wouldn't it make more sense to use 'make -k' inste
Hello everybody.
I need your help to solve the following problem.
The installed version of CMake is: 2.8.0.
The installed version of CPack is: 2.8.0.
I am running on Ubuntu LTS 10.04.
I have a CMake project. The output of the project is an executable. The
executable depends on a number of sha
Hi,
This is Weiyu, a student from University of Germany. I have used
CMake as the build system instead of autotool already for some
projects. but I am still not sure about the way how the libraries
dependencies should be handled, is there any suggestion from CMAKE
group that how the dependencies
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 07:57 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> No. You have the same kernel under the skin and any software that has low-
> level parts thus needs to know that it is running on Windows, be it through
> the cygwin layer or not. How does it do that without the WIN32 define?
With the CY
16 matches
Mail list logo