Good day!
You can try the experimental installer (based on IFW generator) from my website:
http://ifw.podsvirov.pro/cmake/files/v3.5/cmake-3.5.0-rc3-win64-x64.exe
You can also try the online version, which is based on code from branch
"master":
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Ivan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Here is my CMakeLists.txt:
>
> cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.3)
> project(untitled19)
>
> set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} -std=c++11")
>
> set(LIBRARY_SRC library.cpp)
>
> add_library(libra SHARED
Hi, I am new to cmake and really hope am doing this correctly. I asked
stackoverflow but didn't get a good enough answer for my specific problem
here;
If I want root/sub-directories/ as separate sub-projects that can be
compiled using the individualCMakeLists.txts in their folders I find myself
On 3/7/16, Eric Wing wrote:
> On 3/7/16, David Cole wrote:
>> If you include those files in the source list for a library, executable,
>> or
>> custom target, they should show up in IDE projects, and they should be
>> ignored by Makefile type projects. Have
On 3/7/16, David Cole wrote:
> If you include those files in the source list for a library, executable, or
> custom target, they should show up in IDE projects, and they should be
> ignored by Makefile type projects. Have you tried that?
>
>
> David
>
I haven't tried it yet
Dear Sirs,
There are only 32Win version of CMake( cmake-3.5.0-rc3-win32-x86.msi or
cmake-3.5.0-rc3-win32-x86.zip ) on your web page( https://cmake.org/download/
). When will the version for 64Win available?
Thank you for the help!
Ning.
==
LI, Ning. Ph.D.
If you include those files in the source list for a library, executable, or
custom target, they should show up in IDE projects, and they should be ignored
by Makefile type projects. Have you tried that?
David
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 6:34 PM, Eric Wing wrote:
>
> I have a
Seems to me like C# support should work just fine with other generators: ninja,
nmake, and UNIX Makefiles included. Especially with mono on Linux/Mac.
David
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 2:12 PM, Brad King wrote:
>
>> On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP
I have a bunch of .cmake support files in my project that I have split
off from CMakeLists.txt (using INCLUDE to combine them) to separate
concerns. (Source files, application assets, script files, platform
settings, codesigning, etc.)
This works, but they don't show up in IDEs (Visual Studio,
We have to call :
fixup_bundle("${CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/../test"...
to fix an optional test folder installed near the app.
verify_app will later compare a path like C:/program/app/../test to
C:/program/test and state they are inequal while they point to the same
file.
That's why I have to call
Hi all,
Is there any update on this issue?
I believe this addition would be really useful.
Best regards,
Xavier
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Rob Zumwalt wrote:
> Apologies for the new thread, I just subscribed in order to comment on
> this, and didnt know how to
Hi Srinath,
I guess you will find what you need here:
https://cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_RPATH_handling
Best regards,
Xavier
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 4:35 PM, Srinath Vadlamani <
srinath.vadlam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello All,
> How do I keep the rpath used during the build of an executable the
Hello!
I hope someone could finally help me. I spent about two days to find solution
for my problem, but with no luck.
Here is my problem:
I want to create a shared library (dll on Windows, .so on Linux, .dylib on OS
X) that contains some functions. This library should export only these
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 03/07/2016 02:49 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
>> Moving the method into there worked cleanly.
>
> Thanks. I split that into a separate commit:
Thanks. I wondered whether or not to do that separately.
--
Powered by
On 03/07/2016 02:49 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> Moving the method into there worked cleanly.
Thanks. I split that into a separate commit:
cmCommonTargetGenerator: Adopt AppendOSXVerFlag method
https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=1f2b39c6
Then I applied the main change:
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 575399afd14cace26a01e1aed65af8ca6bb9f15d (commit)
via
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Brad King wrote:
> On 03/01/2016 04:58 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
>> I just copied the relevant code from the Makefiles generator.
>
> Thanks. Instead of copying, please look at moving the relevant
> methods up to cmCommonTargetGenerator so
On 02/25/2016 05:51 AM, Stuermer, Michael SP/HZA-ZSEP wrote:
> The part that probably needs most additional work is all the
> C# detection and configuration part in the module scripts.
In your branch Modules/CMakeDetermineCSharpCompiler.cmake currently
has a lot of logic and environment checks
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b6b5792286f9618cb4051585f534feb48f8a1b3f (commit)
via
On 03/01/2016 04:58 PM, Bruce Stephens wrote:
> I just copied the relevant code from the Makefiles generator.
Thanks. Instead of copying, please look at moving the relevant
methods up to cmCommonTargetGenerator so it can be shared between
the two generators instead.
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered
On 03/02/2016 04:36 AM, Richard Wiedenhöft wrote:
> The way I see it there is no downside to this and it spares me (and
> hopefully others) from polluting my CMakeLists.txt with
> "set(CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS ON)" making them more readable.
The down side is it takes longer to generate and
On 03/01/2016 03:15 AM, Antonio Perez Barrero wrote:
> Use recommended case for variable names. i.e. matching name of the
> module as passed to `find_package`.
>
> For backwards compatibility, the upper case versions of both input and
> output variables are used and defined when appropriate.
On 03/04/2016 12:17 PM, Benjamin Ballet wrote:
> The fail occurs during verify_app in the function gp_resolved_file_type
> from module GetPrerequisites. This function test if two paths are equal
> without translating them to there canonical form before.
[snip]
>
On 02/29/2016 12:35 PM, Philippe Proulx wrote:
> This patch adds the FindLTTngUST module which can be used to find
> the LTTng-UST library. It sets result variables and creates an
> imported target, LTTng::UST.
Thanks, applied:
Add FindLTTngUST module to find LTTng-UST library
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via f10ee09337753fb072f7be49c8be76e702cd90fb (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 3b0b7f74286d06da68578a1ec2d64c705eacb3b1 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via f6b21eb251c00c116827fa5824254d64caf6a21e (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via c8d860b991a73dd5206125b747ccda87aa68c0d2 (commit)
via
Hello All,
How do I keep the rpath used during the build of an executable the same
when I install that executable using INSTALL(TARGETS )?
I do set :
SET(CMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH_USE_LINK_PATH TRUE)
=
Srinath Vadlamani
=
--
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via e0751c4d25bba7364a361a55fe31d1567b64e51f (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 8256d021c8324779c7269658a094848ebeafb82e (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b5652bfe6e4443fd380b6883a058f9852ff6b1ad (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 365fb19ffc683351fff43b06d19f3834e8468b35 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 7fc8e4d36d7f198ead73fda577f73bdf650b0c99 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via cfb4d7736e030c08d047153da635b61ca97e3135 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 9fcc8ff455a81379b0eec58b4f763d7699916171 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 38a68b755cb47d6eb75b9717de7003394139c28f (commit)
via
Dear CMakers,
I encountered a strange problem with my cmake setup:
In my CMakeLists.txt files there is a line
install(TARGETS ${PROJECT_NAME} DESTINATION ${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR})
Some of my projects use add_subdirectory, and with make install I "pull" them
right to the build directory.
This used to
Short version: no.
Long version: Visual Studio is heavily built around MSBuild as the back-end of
execution of various tasks. While theoretically it could be done that MSBuild
only acts as a relay and calls into Ninja scripts, you would lose the entire
feature set of Solution Explorer, which
39 matches
Mail list logo