Re: [CMake] Re: Re: Re: Re: Hyperlinked indexed reference?

2007-10-23 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 00:51, Fernando Cacciola wrote: Hi Bill, Just create a patch and send it to me. OK. Here's a patch for cmDocumentationFormatterHTML.cxx It adds, at the beginning of each section, a list with hyperlinks to each entry in it. Unfortunately, adding a similar list

Re: [CMake] Patch for Eclipse generator

2007-10-22 Thread a . neundorf-work
Hi, On Monday 22 October 2007 07:26, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: On 10/21/07, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: ... How about that: If you run cmake in-source, everything should just work. If you run cmake out-of-source, cmake creates two eclipse projects: one project in the

Re: [CMake] Selecting compiler on Windows platform

2007-10-22 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Monday 22 October 2007 11:34, Josef Karthauser wrote: ... However, I’d like to control this from within a CMake file, and this doesn’t appear possible. From what I can see, CMakeDetermineCXXCompiler is loaded and executed prior to the CMakeLists.txt file, which means that I cannot set the

Re: [CMake] Re: Hyperlinked indexed reference?

2007-10-22 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Monday 22 October 2007 15:20, Fernando Cacciola wrote: ... Assuming that's true (I haven't seen any source code), isn't it somewhat simple to extend the pattern so that each command outputs also an HTML friendly documentation entryr? Something like:

Re: [CMake]: Patch for FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS

2007-10-21 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Sunday 21 October 2007 02:31, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: I have created a feature request #5920 for the following issue. I won't apply the changes myself unless I'm assigned the feature, since I don't want to abuse my cvs modules access. The patch looks good so far. So if

Re: [CMake] Patch for Eclipse generator

2007-10-21 Thread a . neundorf-work
Hi, On Sunday 21 October 2007 00:48, you wrote: ... Just to make sure I understand: with this patch the two eclipse project files are always created in the source tree, right ? Right. What happens if you try to create two buildtrees for one source tree, which problems may appear ?

Re: [CMake] Patch for Eclipse generator

2007-10-21 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Monday 22 October 2007 00:19, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, On Sunday 21 October 2007 00:48, you wrote: ... Just to make sure I understand: with this patch the two eclipse project files are always created in the source tree, right ? Right.

Re: [CMake] CMAKE 2.5 MinGW returns bad WIN32

2007-10-19 Thread a . neundorf-work
Hi, On Friday 19 October 2007 06:24, Gonzalo Garramuño wrote: I'm running FindOpenGL and FindGLUT on a mingw based compile, with MSYS Makefiles and CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++. That is, a standard GNU build. FindOpenGL and FindGLUT fail to find the microsoft opengl32.lib and dll and the

Re: [CMake] Patch for Eclipse generator

2007-10-19 Thread a . neundorf-work
Hi, On Friday 19 October 2007 01:18, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: Hello, As I told yesterday, here comes a patch for the Eclipse CDT4 generator available in the current CVS version of CMake. Although I have not extensively tested it, the works fine. In addition to the in-tree build which has

Re: [CMake] CMake 2.5 - MinGW fails with NMake Mafiles

2007-10-19 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Friday 19 October 2007 13:11, David Cole wrote: Do not pass -DCMAKE_SYSTEM=Windows-5.1 on the command line. CMake expects to compute that value itself... On 10/19/07, Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MinGW CMake also says it supports NMake Makefiles (actually, tons of formats

Re: [CMake] including paths - basic

2007-10-19 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 18 October 2007 19:32, Mark Wyszomierski wrote: Hi, I'm new to cmake, it looks great. Is it possible to include different paths conditionally, like: include_directories (${MY_PROJECT_SOURCE_DIR}/my_lib) IF (WIN32) include_directories (C:/my_stuff/lib/something) ELSE (WIN32)

Re: [CMake] Trouble with CMake + Eclipse + SVN/CVS

2007-10-17 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 20:46, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: On 10/17/07, Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/10/17, Pau Garcia i Quiles: After reading those threads, I have been able to make scenario A (out-of-tree build) work with a bit of manual work. I am trying to modify the

Re: [CMake] cmake install and rpath

2007-10-17 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 15:57, James Bigler wrote: I tried digging through through the mailing list and experimenting on my own, but I don't seem to be able to figure this out. I have a toy project that has a shared library and an executable. I've set it up, so that it can be installed

Re: [CMake] FindImageMagick: Rewrite to support all utilities.

2007-10-14 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Saturday 13 October 2007 07:17, Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote: Hello, I've been assigned the task of maintaining the ImageMagick find module. As such, I made a rewrite to support the complete toolchain (i.e., all command line executables) and would like to ask for user feedback

Re: [CMake] make rebuild_cache vs. running cmake

2007-10-11 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Friday 28 September 2007 14:05, Joachim Ziegler wrote: Hello list, I wonder what the difference is between making the target $ make rebuild_cache and a run of $ cmake /path/to/CMakeLists.txt I think there is no difference. Alex ___ CMake

Re: [CMake] how broken is the RPM support?

2007-10-11 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 22:32, Eric Noulard wrote: 2007/10/10, kent williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I just installed the CVS CMake. There is a CPackRPM.cmake file in the Modules directory, but it's not clear to me how to tell CPack I want to generate an RPM, or a Source RPM. If you want

Re: [CMake] Generate Intel Compiler Project Files dire

2007-10-11 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 11 October 2007 17:27, Neumann, Jan (SCR US) wrote: Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to use CMake to generate Visual Studio 2003 or 2005 project files that will use the Intel C++ compiler. I think this is not supported. Currently, I am generating first the Visual Studio

Re: [CMake] module variable naming conventions

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 12 April 2007 02:11, Bob Kuehne wrote: hi, i've been using cmake for a while now, and am writing some of my own modules to find packages, in particular. i was using my own naming convention for return INCLUDE and LIB paths, something like FOO_INCLUDE_DIR and FOO_LIBRARY_DIR, until

Re: [CMake] INSTALL() command from cvs

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 12 April 2007 13:24, Filipe Sousa wrote: Hi! I have some projects that installs system libraries. One of them is libstdc++.so.6 that is symlink to /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/libstdc++.so.6.0.8: $ readlink -f $(g++ -print-file-name=libstdc++.so.6) With cmake 2.4.6

Re: [CMake] How to make executable depend on pre-existing control file?

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
Hi, On Thursday 12 April 2007 19:07, Trevor Kellaway wrote: Hi, I'm try to get my link to depend on a pre-existing file that contains linker segment information link.prm. I thought that by just adding this to the executable dependency list this should work: ADD_EXECUTABLE

Re: [CMake] How to make executable depend on pre-existing control file?

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 12 April 2007 19:33, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: Trevor Kellaway wrote: Hi, I'm try to get my link to depend on a pre-existing file that contains linker segment information link.prm. I thought that by just adding this to the executable dependency list this should work:

Re: [CMake] How to make executable depend on pre-existing controlfile?

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 12 April 2007 21:21, Trevor Kellaway wrote: i, I'm try to get my link to depend on a pre-existing file that contains linker segment information link.prm. [snip] I guess you also have a custom command which generates this file ? Are you sure it's

Re: [CMake] one source file should depend on every other

2007-04-12 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Thursday 12 April 2007 22:00, Denis Stuenkel wrote: Hi, currently my CMakeLists.txt looks basically like this: file(GLOB sources *.cc) add_executable(myprog ${sources}) One of these cc-files just contains: const char* build_date() {return __DATE__;} The obvious problem here is

Re: [CMake] TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES question

2007-04-10 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 20:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to be able to add the full path to the library via TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES. I have looked through the documentation but have not found a way to this. When I TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES( test /path/to/libA.lib) I get the equivalent

Re: [CMake] Why the target is named to liblib instead to lib? (Linux)

2007-03-31 Thread a . neundorf-work
On Saturday 31 March 2007 12:47, Manfred Rebentisch wrote: Hello, I am new to this list, so I beg your pardon, if the question is a recurrence. I use cmake version 2.4-patch 3 on Suse 10.1 . I want to generate a library with the name libstd3000c.so. So I define: CMakeLists.txt BEGIN