On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 01:01, Andrew Maclean wrote:
>
> In build.ninja all the requested linker libraries are there e.g.
> /usr/local/lib/libboost_date_time.so>
> Boost 1.70
> When using Boost 1.70 all I get in the CMakeLists.txt file are entries like:
> //The directory containing a CMake
Has anyone else got issues using Boost 1.70 in their code.
I'm using CMake 3.14.2
I have done the usual build/install of Boost in linux and everything seems
to be installed Ok in /usr/local/include and /usr/local lib.
The problem is the no linker libraries are being found.
I use this in my
I am having a problem with make 3.12 (windows) and cmake version 3.13.0-rc2
(linux). I am attempting to link boost headers privately to a static library,
which is then linked by a client executable, that I do not want to depend on
boost.
According to the docs, the find_package(Boost) provides
Boost Library developers are taking a serious look at making Boost more
friendly for users of CMake. This discussion is taking place on the
Boost Developer's mailing list.
https://www.boost.org/community/groups.html
Those who have an interest in this topic are encouraged to observe
and/or
-italian.co.uk On Behalf Of
Chris Wilson
Sent: 08 August 2018 12:29
To: Wheeler, Gavin
Cc: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Boost + CMake + Windows + Sanity -> Possible?
Hi all,
I solved this problem (or a very similar one) by using a CMake
superbuild<https://
: CMake [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: 07 August 2018 17:34
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Boost + CMake + Windows + Sanity -> Possible?
On 7 August 2018 at 18:15, Wheeler, Gavin wrote:
> [...]
> 1. Look in C:\Program
> Files\CMake\sha
On 7 August 2018 at 18:15, Wheeler, Gavin wrote:
> [...]
> 1. Look in C:\Program
> Files\CMake\share\cmake-3.9\Modules\FindBoost.cmake
Rule #1: never use CMake older than the latest release!
Rule #2: if you die hard for old CMake, force use of the latest FindBoost.cmake
if (CMAKE_VERSION
tea
Best Regards,
Gavin
From: CMake [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Dvir Yitzchaki
Sent: 15 July 2018 08:27
To: Innokentiy Alaytsev ; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Boost + CMake + Windows + Sanity -> Possible?
I recommend using Hunter package manager:
https://docs.hunter
I recommend using Hunter package manager:
https://docs.hunter.sh/en/latest/quick-start/boost-components.html
Regards,
Dvir
-Original Message-
From: CMake On Behalf Of Innokentiy Alaytsev
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 13:29
To: cmake@cmake.org
Subject: Re: [CMake] Boost + CMake
Hello!
First of all, I suggest you use Boost imported targets instead of
Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS and Boost_LIBRARY_DIRS and the
target_include_directories() and target_link_libraries() functions. Al this
is to better support exporting CMake package if you need it. If you do not
produce CMake package
Hello! First the short version...
Can anyone give me a set of instructions to download, build and setup the
latest Boost (currently 1.67) on Windows 10 for VS 2017 64bit such that the
following will work...
find_package(Boost REQUIRED COMPONENTS system filesystem thread date_time
Let's hope this try actually works. It was tried 8 years ago but some of
the boost developers really fought the transition. Hopefully with the
support of the steering committee it will work. Let's all welcome the
boost devs into the CMake community with wide open arms.
--
Mike Jackson
Good news !
Hopefully the bcp would also work with CMake so only requires component
would be installed.
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community.
Very exciting news... hopefully it works out! Congratulations to CMake
for this; this is huge support for CMake and shows it is becoming way
more popular (not that it wasn't already!)
Hello all! 18.07.2017, 20:48, "Gonzalo Garramuño" :> Just posted in the boost mailing list. Congratulations to both teams!> It seems that we are talking about this thread: https://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2017/07/237248.php > --> Gonzalo Garramuño>> -->> Powered by
Just posted in the boost mailing list. Congratulations to both teams!
--
Gonzalo Garramuño
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more
Does anyone know of the happening around Boost 2 and its possible adoption of
CMake? I know Boost and CMake have a very long and very sad history, but I
recall someone reporting on this list that he/she will attend a Boost 2 related
conference and will again promote the benefits of CMake as
Hi David.
Probably something in your CMakeList is set up incorrectly. If you share
that CMakeList, someone might be able to tell what.
Petr
On 10 June 2016 at 13:09, Xi Shen wrote:
> I created a simple command line tool on Windows, using the Boost library.
> I use the
I created a simple command line tool on Windows, using the Boost library. I
use the CMake tool to generate the build file for MSBuild.
I set the BOOST_INCLUDEDIR environment variable and CMake generated the
build file without any error.
However the solution cannot be built by MSBuild. It
Hi,
I have installed Boost on Windows 7 for Visual Studio 2013 by running these
installers:
boost_1_56_0-msvc-12.0-32.exe
boost_1_56_0-msvc-12.0-64.exe
downloaded from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.56.0/.
I'm using CMake 2.8.12.1 and when I try to build a simple
I've used a script to help it out a bit. I think these Windows installers
are new. Here's the script I use - it basically sets BOOST_ROOT and
BOOST_LIBRARYDIR automatically in some cases.
https://gist.github.com/rpavlik/586f1fda6e32777623e1
Ryan
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Glenn Coombs
Ryan,
Thanks for the helper script - I'll try that out on Monday.
Does anybody know if the FindBoost.cmake file is maintained by the CMake
developers, or does it have a 3rd party maintainer ? It would be nice to
see some logic similar to your script incorporated by default so that other
people
You will find a list of CMake Module Maintainers here:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake:Module_Maintainers
If a module is not listed, it is not currently claimed. (Meaning
either nobody is currently maintaining it, or everybody is pitching
in a little bit as things important to them arise.)
On Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:59:25 +0200, Klaim - Joël Lamotte
mjkl...@gmail.com wrote:
For now I think the simplest solution would be to make b2 use a default
64bit lib directory
when the directory is unspecify. Then FindBoost cmake module can rely on
this knowledge to try to find the right
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Slava viatcheslav.sysolt...@h-d-gmbh.dewrote:
In my experience finding/adapting packages for crosscompiling 64-32 is
much more troublesome than setting up 32-bit chroot and using it for 32-bit
builds.
Sorry but I don't understand, certainly because I'm still
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Slava
viatcheslav.sysolt...@h-d-gmbh.dewrote:
You build 64-bit stuff (including boost if you wish) in 64-bit
environment, 32-bit stuff (including boost if you wish) in a separate
32-bit environment. The environment is native for build tools, so you need
no
On 11.10.2012 12:16, Klaim - Joël Lamotte wrote: 2. find a way for CMake FindBoost to automatically
find the 64 bit binaries instead of the 32 bit
binaris.
I don't see a clear solution to achieve this, because it depends a lot on how boost have been
compiled.
Use a naming convention, e.g.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Andreas Haferburg ahaferb...@scopis.comwrote:
I can't guarantee where the boost libraries are installed, that's why I
use FindBoost.
Just make the CMake error message clear, e.g. Boost 1.50 expected to be
found in dir. Most people know how to rename a
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjkl...@gmail.comwrote:
My current understanding is that boost don't have a specific default lib
dir for different address models, which is the source of the problem as
FindBoost script can't rely on a protocol to find these lib files.
Am
I am having a problem with b2 on Windows using Visual Studio (2010 2012
but it is irrelevant):
Until now I was building boost with b2 in a way that would first build 32
bit version in the default library directory, then the 64bit version in
lib/64 .
I wasn't using the 64bit version until this
...@cmake.org] on behalf of Klaim -
Joël Lamotte [mjkl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 5:16 AM
To: Boost users list; cmake@cmake.org
Subject: [CMake] [boost][b2] Differenciate 32bit and 64 bit binaries when using
CMake.
I am having a problem with b2 on Windows using Visual Studio (2010
Júlio Hoffimann said:
I don't know if i understood correctly, but you can set the library
directory by hand, please refer to
/usr/share/cmake-version/Modules/FindBoost.cmake, in particular the
variable BOOST_LIBRARYDIR.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Miller, Frank fmil...@sjm.com wrote:
Júlio Hoffimann said:
I don't know if i understood correctly, but you can set the library
directory by hand, please refer to
/usr/share/cmake-version/Modules/FindBoost.cmake, in particular the
variable BOOST_LIBRARYDIR.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Miller, Frank fmil...@sjm.com wrote:
I am searching boost like as follows :
# Boost Library Search
find_package (Boost)
if (Boost_FOUND)
include_directories(${Boost_INCLUDE_DIRS})
link_directories(${Boost_LIBRARY_DIRS})
set(LIBS ${LIBS} ${Boost_LIBRARIES})
else()
message(FATAL_ERROR Boost Not Found)
endif (Boost_FOUND)
I
Try again with this example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3897839/how-to-link-c-program-with-boost-using-cmake
On 2012-08-08, at 12:52:06 , Sumit Adhikari wrote:
I am searching boost like as follows :
# Boost Library Search
find_package (Boost)
if (Boost_FOUND)
Thanks for the reply. But is this is a Bug ?
Regards,
Sumit
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Nick Overdijk n...@astrant.net wrote:
Try again with this example:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3897839/how-to-link-c-program-with-boost-using-cmake
On 2012-08-08, at 12:52:06 , Sumit
No, as far as I know you need to specify the components for boost always. I
know of some find_boost that just put everything in there when you didn't
name components, but as a rule, just specifiy the components. ;-)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Sumit Adhikari sumit.adhik...@gmail.comwrote:
Problem fixed. Thanks :)
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Nick Overdijk n...@astrant.net wrote:
No, as far as I know you need to specify the components for boost always.
I know of some find_boost that just put everything in there when you didn't
name components, but as a rule, just specifiy
Hi
I'm trying to build a project that uses boost::asio for serial comms. I get
the following error when I try to build:
/usr/include/boost/system/error_code.hpp:208: undefined reference to
`boost::system::get_system_category()'
A copy of the CMake file is located here: http://ideone.com/nRxvK
On Di., 1. Mai. 2012 00:20:58 CEST, Mourad Boufarguine
mou...@boufarguine.name wrote:
Hi,
add this :
link_directories(${Boost_LIBRARY_DIRS})
after the include_directories command.
No, please don't. The target_link_libraries command is what you really want.
Please stop advertising
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
On Di., 1. Mai. 2012 00:20:58 CEST, Mourad Boufarguine
mou...@boufarguine.name wrote:
Hi,
add this :
link_directories(${Boost_LIBRARY_DIRS})
after the include_directories command.
No, please don't. The
On May 1, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Mourad Boufarguine wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
On Di., 1. Mai. 2012 00:20:58 CEST, Mourad Boufarguine
mou...@boufarguine.name wrote:
Hi,
add this :
link_directories(${Boost_LIBRARY_DIRS})
after
Yes, target_link_libraries works well, I had problem before because I used
find_package(Boost) instead of find_package(Boost COMPONENTS thread), so
when I used target_link_libraries( MyProject ${Boost_LIBRARIES} ), it
didn't link anything, after I specify the components in find_package, it
has no
the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
___
Boost-users mailing list
boost-us...@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake
___
Boost-users mailing list
boost-us...@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
--
Sophie Wang
www.sophiehuiwang.com
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
find_package() searches for a package, and sets variables. Typically variables
like...
package_FOUND # package found or not
package_INCLUDE_DIR # path to the libraries include directory
package_LIBRARY # name of the library
You still have to link in the library yourself:
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Daniel Dekkers d.dekk...@cthrough.nl wrote:
find_package() searches for a package, and sets variables. Typically
variables like...
package_FOUND # package found or not
package_INCLUDE_DIR # path to the libraries include directory
package_LIBRARY # name of
Thanks to David Daniel for the replies, but I was
already doing everything by the book, so their replies
didn't help. It seems to be a bug, or flaky feature, in boost; I had
to disable auto-linking. Here's the final, working CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
# Turn off
I'm slowly learning cmake and converting some real software to it,
targeting Linux, Windows, and Mac OS X.
Along the way, I'm making minimal working examples (they're a lot
easier to debug them than the real thing) and putting them up at
David,
Yes, adding call to the front of the command works. Thanks! Would be
great to get that fixed for 2.8.7, as I spent a good portion of
yesterday racking my brain about this.
I also discovered that, if using a variable to build the
CONFIGURE_COMMAND, that variable should be a list, rather
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ben Medina ben.med...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
Yes, adding call to the front of the command works. Thanks! Would be
great to get that fixed for 2.8.7, as I spent a good portion of
yesterday racking my brain about this.
I also discovered that, if using a
I tend to use the online documentation:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#module:ExternalProject
But I agree that an example would also be useful. Perhaps the wiki
could have examples of how to use external project with common 3rd
party libs (e.g. boost, Qt).
On Wed, Oct 26,
Hello all,
I'm trying to build Boost as an external project, but it won't build
if I use the VS2010 generator. I've whittled the code down to the
following CMakeLists.txt:
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 2.8)
project (boost-external)
set (Boost_Source E:/boost_1_47_0)
include(ExternalProject)
Try changing the configure command to call bootstrap.bat instead.
I suspect this is related to the symptoms reported in these bugs:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12445
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12461
Related to using bat or cmd files as custom commands. We need
On 02/10/2011 09:17 PM, Adams, Brian M wrote:
I'm curious if the behavior I'm seeing with respect to FindBoost.cmake is
expected. (I realize I'm using these macros in a convoluted way, so
understand if I can't make it work more cleanly.)
What I'd like to be able to do is something like
I'm curious if the behavior I'm seeing with respect to FindBoost.cmake is
expected. (I realize I'm using these macros in a convoluted way, so understand
if I can't make it work more cleanly.)
What I'd like to be able to do is something like the following to probe for a
system-provided or
I'm not entirely sure why FindBoost uses the cache in the way it does, as it
seems to cause a fair amount of issues. I've made an experimental
modification of FindBoost.cmake that doesn't use internal cache variables
here: [1] It seems to work in my initial tests, but it's probably not ideal
and
Hello all,
I have a library that depends on boost. One user of this library compiles
only x32 version. Second user compiles x64. Third user compiles both x32 and
x64.
First user has only x32 version of the boost in the BOOST_LIBRARYDIR.
Second user only x64 version in the BOOST_LIBRARYDIR.
Third
Hey all. So I noticed a possible bug with the way boost is searched in
findboost.cmake.
Essentially, if you have the boost static runtimes installed, that's what
Visual Studio will require. For example, using the thread library, it will
need libboost_thread*-sgd*
Yet the non-static-runtime
Philip Lowman recently took the mantle for the FindBoost maintenance. He
fixed a bunch of stuff just now for the upcoming (now in release candidate
phase) CMake 2.8.3 release...
Are you reporting this based on CMake 2.8.3-rc2 or an earlier release of
CMake?
Try using the release candidate. I
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:55 PM, assume_R assu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all. So I noticed a possible bug with the way boost is searched in
findboost.cmake.
Essentially, if you have the boost static runtimes installed, that's what
Visual Studio will require. For example, using the thread
Hi,
We are migrating an 'old' Make project into the CMake world, and I am
encountering a problem during the link phase of one of our executables: the
linker cannot open a boost library.
I am using CMake 2.8.2 on WinXP x64, Boost regex library 1.33.1, with Intel
C++/Fortran 9.1 compilers
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Oenen, Jodi van
jodi.vanoe...@tass-safe.com wrote:
Hi,
We are migrating an 'old' Make project into the CMake world, and I am
encountering a problem during the link phase of one of our executables: the
linker cannot open a boost library.
I am using CMake
True :)
As I said, I'm just replicating the current Make system, in which those same
32 bit libs are used -- and it works. CMake even adds some extra 32 bit libs
to the command line; I think they are added in Windows-icl.cmake
(CMAKE_C_STANDARD_LIBRARIES_INIT). So I'd say it should also
otherwise (yay
for Microsoft).
So... Any other suggestions? :)
Jodi
-Original Message-
From: John Drescher [mailto:dresche...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 24 augustus 2010 16:20
To: Oenen, Jodi van; CMake mailing list
Subject: Re: [CMake] Boost lib error when linking executable
True
. I guess those X32.lib libraries are 64 bit, even though the names suggest
otherwise (yay for Microsoft).
I did not know that. Sorry. I admit, I have not looked at the lib
names on my 64 bit builds.
John
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
Hi everyone,
I am using CMake to build some code cross-platform. This code requires Boost
Thread to compile. I am having several problems with FindBoost on Windows.
First, I installed Boost using BoostPro's precompiled binaries at
http://www.boostpro.com/download.
Then I tried the following
On 23.06.09 13:09:25, Curtis Rueden wrote:
First, I installed Boost using BoostPro's precompiled binaries at
http://www.boostpro.com/download.
Then I tried the following CMakeLists.txt file:
--
# Simple CMake build file for testing FindBoost. Fails on Windows with
# Boost
I use the boost pre-compiled all the time and I don't have any of
these issues BUT I do set the BOOST_ROOT environment variable in My
Computer-Advanced Settings after I install which may be the
difference. I use threads, program_options, testing, filesystem and
system.
I did notice in
define BOOST_ROOT and point it at the root install location for boost. I
had the same problem, that fixed it. I only had to do that on windows.
Curtis Rueden wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am using CMake to build some code cross-platform. This code requires
Boost Thread to compile. I am having several
Hi Mike,
I use the boost pre-compiled all the time and I don't have any of these
issues BUT I do set the BOOST_ROOT environment variable in My
Computer-Advanced Settings after I install which may be the difference. I
use threads, program_options, testing, filesystem and system.
Yes, the
define BOOST_ROOT and point it at the root install location for boost. I
had the same problem, that fixed it. I only had to do that on windows.
Thanks Christopher, but I am aware of that fix. Actually, that's what my
hack does -- it uses CMake to set BOOST_ROOT programmatically. What I'm
On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:17 PM, Curtis Rueden wrote:
Hi Mike,
I use the boost pre-compiled all the time and I don't have any of
these issues BUT I do set the BOOST_ROOT environment variable in My
Computer-Advanced Settings after I install which may be the
difference. I use threads,
Christopher Harvey wrote:
define BOOST_ROOT and point it at the root install location for boost. I
had the same problem, that fixed it. I only had to do that on windows.
There seems to be a bug in the FindBoost, BOOST_ROOT should not be
required. I got it to work by adding this:
On 23.06.09 16:17:21, Curtis Rueden wrote:
Also, Looking at the CMakeLists.txt file it seems you are trying to parse
the Boost_THREAD library variable for something? If you are trying to
differentiate between the Release and Debug versions there are the following
variables for each boost
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Bill Hoffmanbill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
Christopher Harvey wrote:
define BOOST_ROOT and point it at the root install location for boost. I
had the same problem, that fixed it. I only had to do that on windows.
There seems to be a bug in the FindBoost,
On 23.06.09 16:23:21, Bill Hoffman wrote:
Christopher Harvey wrote:
define BOOST_ROOT and point it at the root install location for boost. I
had the same problem, that fixed it. I only had to do that on windows.
There seems to be a bug in the FindBoost, BOOST_ROOT should not be
required.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Bart Janssens
bart.janss...@lid.kviv.bewrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Geir Erikstad ge...@baldr.no wrote:
09/3/13 Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com:
I've logged a bug report for it here. I'm pretty sure the best fix
would be
to get FindBoost to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Geir Erikstad ge...@baldr.no wrote:
09/3/13 Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com:
I've logged a bug report for it here. I'm pretty sure the best fix would be
to get FindBoost to ignore the system component when it's detected a version
less than 1.35. I've attached a
09/3/13 Philip Lowman phi...@yhbt.com:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Bart Janssens bart.janss...@lid.kviv.be
wrote:
Not sure if this ever came up, but I'm struggling with FindBoost and
the boost system library. The system library is required from boost
1.35 onwards, but doesn't exist in
I just did an svn update of a very old boost-cmake folder and ran cmake.
Everything built with no errors (Visual studio 2008) (lots of warnings,
but no errors).
I wonder.
How well is CMakeification of Boost going? Will standard releases of
Boost contain CMakeLists files in my lifetime? and
I would ask on the boost-cmake mailing list. You will probably get
good replies from notable people from the boost project.
_
Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software
Will standard releases of Boost
contain CMakeLists files in my lifetime?
They do already. 1.38.0 did. Although I did not have good success
building it that way.
John
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:08 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
Will standard releases of Boost
contain CMakeLists files in my lifetime?
They do already. 1.38.0 did. Although I did not have good success
building it that way.
Here is a link to the release notes (look at the bottom
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:09 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:08 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
Will standard releases of Boost
contain CMakeLists files in my lifetime?
They do already. 1.38.0 did. Although I did not have good success
John
Thanks for this info. The version I compiled from the boost-cmake svn
repository was 1.36 so I didn't realize that the main branch had it
included.
I'll give 1.38 a try.
JB
Will standard releases of Boost
contain CMakeLists files in my lifetime?
They do
Hi all,
Not sure if this ever came up, but I'm struggling with FindBoost and
the boost system library. The system library is required from boost
1.35 onwards, but doesn't exist in earlier versions. Is there a way to
make CMake only look for the system library if the boost version is
greater than
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Bart Janssens bart.janss...@lid.kviv.bewrote:
Not sure if this ever came up, but I'm struggling with FindBoost and
the boost system library. The system library is required from boost
1.35 onwards, but doesn't exist in earlier versions. Is there a way to
make
Hi list,
Sometimes when using the FindBoost.cmake package I have a very hard time
figuring out what valid names for the components list are. Normally I
just do a google code search but now I can't find what I'm looking for.
I'd like to check to make sure that the boost uBLAS library is
On 06.11.08 16:56:52, Christopher Harvey wrote:
Hi list,
Sometimes when using the FindBoost.cmake package I have a very hard time
figuring out what valid names for the components list are. Normally I
just do a google code search but now I can't find what I'm looking for.
I'd like to
uBLAS is part of the 'numeric' library and is NOT a compiled library
so just having the boost headers installed correctly is enough.
On Nov 6, 2008, at 4:56 PM, Christopher Harvey wrote:
Hi list,
Sometimes when using the FindBoost.cmake package I have a very hard
time figuring out what
On Saturday 01 November 2008 20:16:42 Michael Jackson wrote:
Just wanted to let the cmake community know that very early CMake
support has been added to the Boost trunk. Currently only some of the
That is great news! Occasionally I struggle to cross-compile Boost, and
this should make it a lot
2008/11/2 Esben Mose Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday 01 November 2008 20:16:42 Michael Jackson wrote:
Just wanted to let the cmake community know that very early CMake
support has been added to the Boost trunk. Currently only some of the
That is great news! Occasionally I struggle to
Daniel Stonier wrote:
2008/11/2 Esben Mose Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Saturday 01 November 2008 20:16:42 Michael Jackson wrote:
Just wanted to let the cmake community know that very early CMake
support has been added to the Boost trunk. Currently only some of the
That is great news!
FIXED..
Thanks for the feedback
Mike
On Nov 2, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Maik Beckmann wrote:
2008/11/1 Michael Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Michael,
If you want to have a look try reading the following wiki page for
more
details:
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/CMakeConfigAndBuild
For some reason in Windows the default inclde library is called
Boost-1_36 not Boost_1_36. There have been several requests to fix
FindBoost to include this variant (search the buglist).
Andrew
2008/10/23 Emre Turkay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to compile boost with cmake and MS
Hi folks,
I'm trying to compile boost with cmake and MS Visual Studio 2003 on Windows.
However, when I run the cmake I get:
CMake Error at C:/Program Files/CMake
2.6/share/cmake-2.6/Modules/FindBoost.cmak
e:620 (message):
Unable to find the requested Boost libraries.
Boost version: 1.35.0
On Sunday 12 October 2008 20:58:07 0xd34df00d wrote:
Hi there!
How could one find and link to boost.system only if boost's version is
greater or equal 1.35?
FIND_PACKAGE( Boost 1.35 COMPONENTS system)
after that, you have to check BOOST_FOUND and act accordingly.
I think you need cmake 2.5+
Hi there!
How could one find and link to boost.system only if boost's version is
greater or equal 1.35?
--
Rudoy Georg
LeechCraft — http://sourceforge.net/projects/leechcraft and
http://deviant-soft.ws
Spicy — http://deviant-soft.ws
___
CMake
Miguel A. Figueroa-Villanueva wrote:
Hello,
The following snippet from the Boost-CMake build CMakeLists.txt file
is not working for me. Particularly, the REGEX .svn is causing the
rule to create the ${BOOST_HEADER_DIR}, but doesn't copy all the files
and subdirectories. It doesn't report any
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo