Bill Hoffman escreveu:
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
conclusion that Brandon needs to be kicked off the list.
I hate to be drawn into this, but I agree with Rodolfo that banning
may be overly harsh. One important thing Brandon was reasonably
restrained at was personal attacks. He generally argued on issues and
though not everybody agreed he was arguing on issues that always
mattered, he generally
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
On 2008-03-04 19:36-0300 Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
Bill Hoffman escreveu:
This is a difficult decision for me. I have never been forced into a
situation like this. However, Brandon's posts to this list have been
disruptive to the community and myself. I have therefore come to the
Ben Ratzlaff escreveu:
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Sometimes in the heat of an argument one can make a regrettable
decision. I
On Wednesday 05 March 2008, Ben Ratzlaff wrote:
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Yes, there was more, as Bill told me at FOSDEM.
Alex
Rodolfo Lima wrote:
Ben Ratzlaff escreveu:
Why do we need to keep him around? If Bill has determined that such
steps are needed, then I must conclude that something more serious has
happened behind the scenes that we are not aware of.
Sometimes in the heat of an argument one can make a
