On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:47 +0100, Eric Noulard wrote:
I'll review it and probably merge it soon, since this looks reasonable.
Note however that with CPackRPM you have both
CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_SUMMARY
and
CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION
whereas for DEB you don't have summary, just:
2011/11/2 Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com:
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 11:47 +0100, Eric Noulard wrote:
I'll review it and probably merge it soon, since this looks reasonable.
Note however that with CPackRPM you have both
CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_SUMMARY
and
CPACK_RPM_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION
whereas for DEB
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:59 +0100, Eric Noulard wrote:
I think this one is acceptable since it may be considered a bug
(you may open one exactly for that purpose)
to use summary when you expect full 'description'.
The then almost backward compatible algorithm would be:
1) use
Hi,
I'm new to this list and just recently started to use CMake and CPack.
So far I'm very pleased but there's one thing that I think could use
some improvement;
As far as I van see (from Wiki) the RPM generating backend of CPack uses
CPACK_PACKAGE_DESCRIPTION_FILE if
2011/11/1 Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com:
Hi,
I'm new to this list and just recently started to use CMake and CPack.
So far I'm very pleased but there's one thing that I think could use
some improvement;
As far as I van see (from Wiki) the RPM generating backend of CPack use
You can get up
