Eric Noulard wrote
Has the issue been resolved in 2.8.10?
Nope.
And I have very little hope for 2.8.11 either since I have not free
time windows visibility
to work on that for myself now...
Sorry.
--
Erk
Le gouvernement représentatif n'est pas la démocratie --
2013/3/3 hce jupiter@gmail.com:
Hi Eric,
That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the
component package name in 2.8.8?
Not yet see:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997
Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either.
I know it will be useful for many of us, I
Hi Eric,
That is not a good format of rpm package name. Can we take control the
component package name in 2.8.8?
Not yet see:
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997
Won't probably be in 2.8.9 either.
I know it will be useful for many of us, I just lack time to go through
it.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/6/28 hce jupiter@gmail.com:
m.hergarden wrote
The unspecified may come from an Install statement that does not have a
component specified.
Micha
I actually double checked, there are only two
m.hergarden wrote
The unspecified may come from an Install statement that does not have a
component specified.
Micha
I actually double checked, there are only two install statements which all
have component specified. Could it be the bug?
Thank you.
Jupiter
--
View this message in
2012/6/28 hce jupiter@gmail.com:
m.hergarden wrote
The unspecified may come from an Install statement that does not have a
component specified.
Micha
I actually double checked, there are only two install statements which all
have component specified. Could it be the bug?
Yes it
Hi,
I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html
where Eric Noulard pointed out that we could not control component package
name for the reason of unique package name. I am currently running on 2.8.8
and generated
The unspecified may come from an Install statement that does not have a
component specified.
Micha
On 06/27/2012 01:44 PM, hce wrote:
Hi,
I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html
where Eric Noulard pointed
2012/6/27 hce jupiter@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on
http://cmake.3232098.n2.nabble.com/Component-Package-Name-td6976896.html
where Eric Noulard pointed out that we could not control component package
name for the reason of unique package name. I am
Thanks Eric and Micha for the clarification.
Jupiter
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:54 AM, Eric Noulard eric.noul...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/6/27 hce jupiter@gmail.com:
Hi,
I've read some discussions posted ten months ago on
10 matches
Mail list logo
