Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator and source_group

2011-09-21 Thread Tomasz Grobelny
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 06:50:39 +0200, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.net wrote: On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:11:19 PM Tomasz Grobelny wrote: Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘Option virtualFolder=Source Files /’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)? I

[CMake] CodeBlocks generator and source_group

2011-09-20 Thread Tomasz Grobelny
Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘Option virtualFolder=Source Files /’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)? I would expect it to happen by using 'SOURCE_GROUP(Source Files FILES ${SOURCES})' construct but it does not work for me (should it?). -- Regards, Tomasz

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator and source_group

2011-09-20 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:11:19 PM Tomasz Grobelny wrote: Is there any way to make cmake generate ‘Option virtualFolder=Source Files /’ element for Unit elements in CodeBlocks Project file (cbp)? I would expect it to happen by using 'SOURCE_GROUP(Source Files FILES ${SOURCES})'

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator

2011-05-03 Thread Jesse
I have the same problem. Im using 8.2.3. Please post if you find a solution. ___ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator

2011-04-19 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Tuesday 19 April 2011, Dan Schmidt wrote: Hi everybody, I was wondering if anyone has run into the following problem. With version 2.8.2 of cmake, the project generated for C::B included the tree of the src files starting at the base of the project. However, I've upgraded to cmake 2.8.4,

[CMake] CodeBlocks generator

2011-04-18 Thread Dan Schmidt
Hi everybody, I was wondering if anyone has run into the following problem. With version 2.8.2 of cmake, the project generated for C::B included the tree of the src files starting at the base of the project. However, I've upgraded to cmake 2.8.4, and the tree starts from /, which is driving

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets

2009-09-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 05 August 2009, David Cole wrote: On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.netwrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote: That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has moved to line 390, but the same

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets

2009-08-05 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote: That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has moved to line 390, but the same code is still there... Looks like that whole else chunk should be removed. Unless somebody can say why it's there...? In order to keep some

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets

2009-08-05 Thread David Cole
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Neundorf a.neundorf-w...@gmx.netwrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009, David Cole wrote: That looks like line 201 in CMake-2-6-4 source tree. In CVS HEAD, this has moved to line 390, but the same code is still there... Looks like that whole else chunk

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets

2009-07-30 Thread Pierre-Julien Villoud
: cmake Objet : Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks Generator misses custom targets Yes sorry, I did not precise that it was 2.6.4 source tree. Are you saying that if I take CVS HEAD, and I compile it, I will have all the target I created in the CodeBlocks project ? De : David Cole [mailto:david.c

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator issues

2008-03-03 Thread Félix C. Morency
Philip, You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my project did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully. Thank you, Félix C. Morency On 3/2/08, Philip Lowman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Félix C. Morency [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator issues

2008-03-03 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Monday 03 March 2008, Félix C. Morency wrote: Philip, You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my project did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully. If you find any issues, please filel bug reports :-) Known issue: Compile current file is not

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator issues

2008-03-03 Thread Philip Lowman
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alexander Neundorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 03 March 2008, Félix C. Morency wrote: Philip, You seem to be right. Changing the build target to the name of my project did the trick. I can now run and debug the program successfully. If you find

[CMake] CodeBlocks generator issues

2008-03-02 Thread Félix C. Morency
Hi, I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under CodeBlocks 8.02. However, running the program (which is a command line program) from

Re: [CMake] CodeBlocks generator issues

2008-03-02 Thread Philip Lowman
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Félix C. Morency [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just discovered that CMake SVN (future 2.6.0) currently supports CodeBlocks project generation. I gave it a try and the result seems promising. I've been able to successfully compile my project under CodeBlocks