I had the same problem a yesterday (or the day before) with the
string( FIND ) command...
I tried to find the cmake 2.8.4 docs but I couldn't. I think you
should do it, or at least to issue a warning (in the documentation) in
every command that wasn't introduced in CMake 2.8.0...
Yes, the Python
2011/12/21 Renato Utsch renatout...@gmail.com:
I had the same problem a yesterday (or the day before) with the
string( FIND ) command...
I tried to find the cmake 2.8.4 docs but I couldn't.
cmake command **itself** is able to spit out its documentation.
So
cmake --help-command string
will
You ?
This represents a fair amount of work...
I bet that if no-one did it it is because it's a hUGe task.
Sorry, I am not that good with english, I meant as the CMake team with
'you'. But the 'CMake team' could do that with new releases, like,
writing this warning with additions in the newer
As I already said, all the old documentation (back to version 1.6,
AFAIK) is available on the wiki.
Michael
On 12/21/2011 01:12 PM, Renato Utsch wrote:
You ?
This represents a fair amount of work...
I bet that if no-one did it it is because it's a hUGe task.
Sorry, I am not that good with
Yes, but is not so easy to find. It would be easier to have it in the
documentation page (if the page hosts CMake 2.6 or CMake 2.4
documentations, why it doesn't host CMake 2.8.3 documentation? They
should be on the wiki too!), easier to find.
Renato
2011/12/21 Michael Wild them...@gmail.com:
Message -
From: Renato Utsch renatout...@gmail.com
To: cmake@cmake.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:38:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Documentation request
Yes, but is not so easy to find. It would be easier to have it in the
documentation page (if the page hosts CMake 2.6 or CMake 2.4
- Original Message -
From: Renato Utsch renatout...@gmail.com
To: cmake@cmake.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 8:38:27 AM
Subject: Re: [CMake] Documentation request
Yes, but is not so easy to find. It would be easier to have it in the
documentation page (if the page hosts CMake 2.6
On 21 December 2011 18:10, Renato Utsch renatout...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, exactly, the way it is now is not obvious, but it should be.
I indeed thought that CMake 2.8 documentation was for 2.8.*, but I
discovered this week that it wasn't. And I'm sure that this happens
with A LOT of people.
Hi,
I don't know if this will get done, but is it possible for future releases of
CMake to change the name on the website for the documentation? For example, if
you just looked at the URL:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html
and you didn't look at the header (which happens a
On 12/21/2011 02:24 AM, Tim Gallagher wrote:
Hi,
I don't know if this will get done, but is it possible for future releases of
CMake to change the name on the website for the documentation? For example,
if you just looked at the URL:
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html
Am Mittwoch 21 Dezember 2011, 06:14:03 schrieb Michael Wild:
OTOH, I think it would be very useful to mention the first version a
feature was introduced in the docs directly, similarly to what Python
does (see e.g.
http://docs.python.org/library/string.html#string-formatting).
We already
11 matches
Mail list logo