On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
>
> I think so.
> In this case, this should also be added to CheckCXXSourceRuns,
> CheckCSourceCompiles and CheckCXXSourceCompiles.
>
> Alex
>
http://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=12944
Patch changes all four files and addes a note to the d
OK - how should I proceed? File a bug report and submit patches for
all of the files?
Cheers,
CY
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Alexander Neundorf
wrote:
> I think so.
> In this case, this should also be added to CheckCXXSourceRuns,
> CheckCSourceCompiles and CheckCXXSourceCompiles.
>
> Alex
On Wednesday 01 February 2012, Clifford Yapp wrote:
> We currently have a minor local enhancement to CHECK_C_RUNS_SOURCE
> that I would like to contribute back to the main module, if it is
> acceptable to the developers of CMake:
>
> We often have our own .c file stored in our tree for TRY_RUN tes
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 19:27:22 schrieb Clifford Yapp:
>> We currently have a minor local enhancement to CHECK_C_RUNS_SOURCE
>
> This is at least missing documentation ;)
>
> Eike
I can add that if there is any chance of it being acce
Am Dienstag, 31. Januar 2012, 19:27:22 schrieb Clifford Yapp:
> We currently have a minor local enhancement to CHECK_C_RUNS_SOURCE
> that I would like to contribute back to the main module, if it is
> acceptable to the developers of CMake:
>
> We often have our own .c file stored in our tree for T
We currently have a minor local enhancement to CHECK_C_RUNS_SOURCE
that I would like to contribute back to the main module, if it is
acceptable to the developers of CMake:
We often have our own .c file stored in our tree for TRY_RUN testing,
and it is convenient to be able to use CHECK_C_RUNS_SOUR
