Re: [CMake] FindThreads: the odd one out?

2009-09-07 Thread Marcel Loose
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 21:55 +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Sunday 30 August 2009, Philip Lowman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Marcel Loose wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Up till now I've been using the not officially supported and released > > > FindPthreads.cmake macro to c

Re: [CMake] FindThreads: the odd one out?

2009-09-04 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Sunday 30 August 2009, Philip Lowman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Marcel Loose wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Up till now I've been using the not officially supported and released > > FindPthreads.cmake macro to check for the presence of pthreads. However, > > the maintainer of that ma

Re: [CMake] FindThreads: the odd one out?

2009-08-29 Thread Philip Lowman
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:29 AM, Marcel Loose wrote: > Hi all, > > Up till now I've been using the not officially supported and released > FindPthreads.cmake macro to check for the presence of pthreads. However, > the maintainer of that macro wrote (a comment in Mantis) that he would > drop suppo

[CMake] FindThreads: the odd one out?

2009-08-28 Thread Marcel Loose
Hi all, Up till now I've been using the not officially supported and released FindPthreads.cmake macro to check for the presence of pthreads. However, the maintainer of that macro wrote (a comment in Mantis) that he would drop support for FindPthreads in favor of the more general and officially su