On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
There has been a lot of traffic here concerning the CMake Ninja
backend for more than a year with some claims that that combination is
now working pretty well on all platforms. Therefore, my curiosity has
been
On 2012-07-19 09:04+0200 Nicolas Desprès wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
There has been a lot of traffic here concerning the CMake Ninja
backend for more than a year with some claims that that combination is
now working pretty well on all
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.cawrote:
On 2012-07-19 09:04+0200 Nicolas Desprès wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Alan W. Irwin ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca
**wrote:
There has been a lot of traffic here concerning the CMake Ninja
backend for
On 19/07/2012 11:00, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
As far as I know the last official release of CMake supports Ninja
backend for both Linux and Windows.
I believe CMake 2.8.9 is required for Ninja on Windows. It hasn't been
released yet.
Martine's Ninja is the official
repository. Although I am
There has been a lot of traffic here concerning the CMake Ninja
backend for more than a year with some claims that that combination is
now working pretty well on all platforms. Therefore, my curiosity has
been aroused even though I am fairly satisfied with the CMake Make
backend. So I would
