Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Those of you who haven't already read Version Control and 'the 80%'
should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before* forming
your opinion on centralized version control.
That article mixes some reasonable points with a good dose of nonsense,
so please
Joshua Jensen wrote:
* Con: Requires an SSH daemon to push data. I just barely got this
going (through copSSH) with the replacement git-shell, because I don't
want people to have shell access to my machine. Locking down user
permissions and directories on a Windows box stinks. I've got to
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Here are my two cents:
I actually held Linus opinion in rather high regard until he went
berzerk on how bad Subversion is.
At 1/5/2008 09:24 PM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Those of you who haven't already read Version Control and 'the
80%' should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before*
forming your opinion on centralized version control.
Interesting read, especially the paragraph about: In a
On Jan 5, 2008 5:58 PM, Sebastien BARRE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 1/5/2008 09:24 PM, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
Those of you who haven't already read Version Control and 'the
80%' should do so (http://blog.red-bean.com/sussman/?p=79) *before*
forming your opinion on centralized version control.
Jesper Eskilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Check out this presentation by Randal Schwartz on git. He describes it,
On 12/22/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 22, 2007 6:48 PM, Andreas Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS - SVN
migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for
On Jan 4, 2008 10:17 AM, E. Wing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Linus pointed to some scalability problems in Monotone and I
think others have pointed to performance and memory usage problems
with Bazaar (OpenSolaris?, Mozilla?).
I don't know what they tried before, but Mozilla is a
On 2008-01-04 07:17-0800 E. Wing wrote:
My 2 cents.
Distributed [version control system] is the right way to go in my opinion.
I don't completely agree. Centralized repositories have proved useful for
lots of software development projects (e.g., the 160,000+ free software
projects at
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
developers, but most software projects (such as CMake) will never have more
than a handful of active developers
cmake already has about 10-20 or so developers (if you consider all the
.cmake module contributions). People with commit access, however, are
much fewer right
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.
I have this strange preference for my own voice and personality :-)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7724296011317502612
b
___
CMake mailing
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
However, I admit to having no development experience with git or Mercurial.
Is there anything compelling (e.g., fewer bugs, better documentation, more
useful features aside from distributed?) about either over svn for
projects like CMake that use a centralized repo?
A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Git - straight from Linus.. Kinda long but interesting.. as long as
you can get past Linus' personality.
Mike
On Jan 4, 2008 4:11 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
However, I admit to having no development
On Jan 4, 2008 3:50 PM, Alan W. Irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-01-04 07:17-0800 E. Wing wrote:
My 2 cents.
Distributed [version control system] is the right way to go in my opinion.
I don't completely agree. Centralized repositories have proved useful for
lots of software
Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
- Original Message -
From: James Mansion
Date: 1/4/2008 3:38 PM
Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize
that you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
Pretty well, I've found,
On 2008-01-04 22:38- James Mansion wrote:
Gonzalo Garramu�o wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
As already mentioned earlier in this thread, git is
James Mansion wrote:
Gonzalo Garramuño wrote:
In summary, once you use git, if you are like me, you'll realize that
you've been doing source version control wrong all these years *sigh*.
Does git work on Win32?
Yes, but not as well as on Linux. There's two ports of it.
The cygwin port
And what about Bazaar (the tool used by Ubuntu/Caronical) ?
http://bazaar-vcs.org/
Regards,
Félix C. Morency
Message: 2
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:53:10 -0500
From: Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CMake] Re: Migration to subversion
To: cmake@cmake.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL
That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS - SVN migration,
I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming you weren't
using svn and trying to sell it to you :)
Regards,
rod
___
CMake mailing list
CMake@cmake.org
Use cvs2cl and read the ChangeLog file that the command creates. I only
know
it on Linux though. The result is pretty much the same as svn log.
Thanks Hendrik, this will be a valuable tool.
svn doesn't really do tagging and branching, it only does copies.
Which accomplishes the same
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS - SVN
migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming
you weren't using svn and trying to sell it to you :)
Before you switch to svn please use git. It's much better than the pain
On Dec 22, 2007 6:48 PM, Andreas Schneider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima wrote:
That's great news. Since I've never been involved in a CVS - SVN
migration, I couldn't help so much with it. Also, excuse me for assuming
you weren't using svn and trying to sell it to you :)
23 matches
Mail list logo
