Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The comments
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Gonzalo Garramuño
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is not the ruby syntax that is horrendous but the rake one. I'm a
true fan of ruby but not of rake. Raven is just a wrapper built on top
of rake to add java functionality
Ok, good to know. I'm tempted to say
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The comments following this article are interesting. For instance, on syntax:
This is just stupid. The Ruby syntax is
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2007/12/05/introducing-raven-an-elegant-build-for-java.html
The comments following this article are
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/buildr/
A review of Buildr
http://danielroop.com/blog/2007/08/25/buildr-review/#more-50
Says that Buildr is
