On 09/12/2011 09:06 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 20:30, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using a custom command that runs the unit test using a
wrapper script that upon successful completion creates a stamp-file and
depends upon the unit-test executable
On 09/13/2011 11:05 AM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 09/12/2011 09:06 PM, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 20:30, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using a custom command that runs the unit test using a
wrapper script that upon successful completion creates a stamp-file
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Erik Johansson e...@ejohansson.se wrote:
How does one get cmake to run the unit test as part of the build so that:
- If the unit test fails, the build fails.
- If the unit test has failed, and make is run again, the unit test
will run again.
- If the unit
On Mon 12 Sep 2011 05:47:18 PM CEST, Ben Medina wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Erik Johansson e...@ejohansson.se wrote:
How does one get cmake to run the unit test as part of the build so that:
- If the unit test fails, the build fails.
- If the unit test has failed, and make is run
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 20:30, Michael Wild them...@gmail.com wrote:
How about using a custom command that runs the unit test using a
wrapper script that upon successful completion creates a stamp-file and
depends upon the unit-test executable target itself?
This seems to work:
Hi,
How does one get cmake to run the unit test as part of the build so that:
- If the unit test fails, the build fails.
- If the unit test has failed, and make is run again, the unit test
will run again.
- If the unit test has succeeded, and make is run again, the unit test
will not run again.