Re: [CMake] Text user configuration (features, flags) that is more persistent than cache?

2012-06-22 Thread Christian Arnault
Hi, What is mentioned here has been implemented in our configuration system (CMT previously implemented in pure C++/make and currently re-implemented on top of CMake) The principle is to add on top of the build system (say CMake, but this could be plain make, or Waf) a layer that describes

Re: [CMake] Text user configuration (features, flags) that is more persistent than cache?

2012-06-22 Thread Ben Morgan
Hi Eli, On 21 June 2012 21:25, Ateljevich, Eli e...@water.ca.gov wrote: Hi, I was wondering if there is a best practice for providing a file for user configuration decisions (options, unique flags) that will be more persistent than the cache? I have a project where a dozen or two

Re: [CMake] Text user configuration (features, flags) that is more persistent than cache?

2012-06-22 Thread Ateljevich, Eli
. Thanks again. Eli From: cmake-boun...@cmake.org [cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Ben Morgan [bmorgan.warw...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 8:32 AM To: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Text user configuration (features, flags) that is more persistent

[CMake] Text user configuration (features, flags) that is more persistent than cache?

2012-06-21 Thread Ateljevich, Eli
Hi, I was wondering if there is a best practice for providing a file for user configuration decisions (options, unique flags) that will be more persistent than the cache? I have a project where a dozen or two algorithmic decisions have to be made. I find that this is just enough that cache