Quoting Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In summary, thanks. But, no thanks. With all those problems I did not
even bother checking the speed.
I got a chuckle out of their self-description on
On Dec 18, 2007 3:08 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not only waf does not care about Windows but they explicitly do
not want to support it. That's the reason why KDE4 is using CMake
instead of SCons or waf.
Heh! Well it's no different than the FSF's attitude with GNU
On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In summary, thanks. But, no thanks. With all those problems I did not
even bother checking the speed.
I got a chuckle out of their self-description on
http://www.ohloh.net/tags/build/make , which one might view as a short
it is
implemented.
Regards,
Félix C. Morency
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:38:28 -0500
From: Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CMake] Waf build tool
To: cmake@cmake.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:55 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've subscribed to the SCons mailing list. The SCons community has
people who got fed up with it and started their own RD. It seems
that the SCons Python 1.5 limitation is a serious one, as developers
On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every wrote:
Waf is the offering of a fellow
who clearly thinks OO is important in a build system for some reason.
http://code.google.com/p/waf/
A quick eval of waf
Ok, waf sucks. It can't demonstrate
On Sunday 16 December 2007, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Dec 16, 2007 1:11 PM, Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every wrote:
Waf is the offering of a fellow
who clearly thinks OO is important in a build system for some reason.
http://code.google.com/p/waf/
A
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
What's the purpose ?
CMake is kind-of going OO.
Meaning *what*, exactly?
Do you mean that
a) say FILE( READ ... )
will change to:
File.read() or x.read() where x is a file object?
and LIST( APPEND ... )
On Sunday 16 December 2007, you wrote:
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
What's the purpose ?
CMake is kind-of going OO.
Meaning *what*, exactly?
That the cmake objects (source files, targets, directories) are not only
influenced by global variables, but they have their own encapsulated set of
On Dec 15, 2007 1:55 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 12:41 PM, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some vocal
complainers about the language, but I suspect there is a silent majority
that really don't care,
CMake is a self-selecting community.
On Saturday 15 December 2007, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:55 PM, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 12:41 PM, Bill Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some vocal
complainers about the language, but I suspect there is a silent
majority that
11 matches
Mail list logo
