Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-12 Thread Philip Lowman
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Michael Jackson wrote: > I'll admit up front that I have NOT tried out the latest CVS Cmake BUT > something that I sometimes have add into the FindBoost are outputs that > print all the variant names of the boost library that CMake is trying to > search for with th

Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-10 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Philip Lowman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> 3. The only way to get error is to explicitly use REQUIRED option >> >> FIND_PACKAGE(Boost 1.36 REQUIRED) >> >> but for FIND_PACKAGE(ZLIB) as explained in point 2. above >> it is not necessary to explicitly specify

Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-09 Thread Philip Lowman
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Fabio Fracassi wrote: > Philip Lowman schrieb: > >> If you have any other CMake related suggestions please feel free to >> accompany your mailing list posts with a feature request and/or patch on the >> bugtracker if you have the time. >> >> >> http://public.kitware

Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-09 Thread Michael Jackson
I'll admit up front that I have NOT tried out the latest CVS Cmake BUT something that I sometimes have add into the FindBoost are outputs that print all the variant names of the boost library that CMake is trying to search for with the BOOST_DEBUG enabled. I think this would be useful for w

Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-09 Thread Fabio Fracassi
Philip Lowman schrieb: If you have any other CMake related suggestions please feel free to accompany your mailing list posts with a feature request and/or patch on the bugtracker if you have the time. http://public.kitware.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Modules/FindBoost.cmake?root=CMake&view=log

Re: [CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-10-08 Thread Philip Lowman
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > 3. The only way to get error is to explicitly use REQUIRED option > > FIND_PACKAGE(Boost 1.36 REQUIRED) > > but for FIND_PACKAGE(ZLIB) as explained in point 2. above > it is not necessary to explicitly specify REQUIRED option > and error is

[CMake] Why FindBoost messaging not unified?

2009-09-29 Thread Mateusz Loskot
Hi, I'm using CMake 2.6-patch2 on Linux (Ubuntu 9.04). In my opinion FindBoost does not follow somewhat standard behaviour of other CMake macros (i.e. ZLIB). In my project I call FIND_PACKAGE this way: IF(WITH_ZLIB) FIND_PACKAGE(ZLIB) ENDIF() and here are output variants I get and I expect: