Hi Clément, hi Omar,
thanks for all you're tipps!
It turns out that I had CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH and the PATHS as well as
the HINTS are not used if they're not somewhere under
CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH. Since all the libs are in a common prefix, I just
added that to CMAKE_FIND_ROOT_PATH.
On 02/27/2015
Hi.
I can’t divine how to get find_package to look for boost in the various places
it might be on the various systems where we do builds.
Boost might be in any of these places
/usr/local/include/boost
/usr/local/boost/1.57.0/include
/usr/local/boost/1.56.0/include etc.
I am generating libs from header-only source files, I have a simple header with
no dependencies, and a header with boost_filesystem and boost_system
dependencies.
I am facing linking problems (ld) against boost, when I link the library to
the test executable. Tests are in a subdirectory, with
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Aleix Pol aleix...@kde.org wrote:
Dear cmake'rs,
I'm rewriting the KDevelop plugin from scratch to fetch the information from
the build directory.
Now in the first implementation I'm using the compile_commands.json file
that cmake already can generate for
By the way, I am using:
cmake version 3.2.20150216-gf724a
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For
20150302)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20150303)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/post-receive
--
CMake
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via 0c438b962c6585043dc055d3e4b6aaa2e99e090e (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via b80f57d14676b2f639554496c0b9d19c67e0aa2b (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, release has been updated
via 6b6852a0ebe6d2c05ea500f78349e4fdbadcecd9 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ae266f05ef6da227ba295ed22291e1fe746aaf05 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via e2055b172eb4ed40893bc2e110a5640d078eef22 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 5261c357aef02f63a44060a6bea3e7f614758e08 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via b3381c5c79e2b7ef57a1d035e73d37ec2ee0aa45 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 17b4423c4509e747814f2c5564239ec72659b6f0 (commit)
via
Hi,
Wouldn't it be better to have compability matrix generated automatically?
Assuming we can automate process of building CMake and executing tests for any
particular version we want, couldn't we create test suite checking if feature X
works in version Y of CMake? This way we could maintain
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via ac5440e7341faeac3598711f62eee8039462f72b (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, master has been updated
via 56be75b3107b210631919c13496060d648f97b14 (commit)
via
Hi,
Is there any chance that the version compatibility matrix will be
updated for cmake 3.x features?
Short answer: no.
Longer answer:
I've written and maintained the compatibility matrix before.
The reasons I've stopped maintaining the page:
(1) Distilling the changes between versions is
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project CMake.
The branch, next has been updated
via cf240dfa5d985e5ac8f7e11abf1bc2646b8b0a9e (commit)
via
Apparently, command line to link executable is quite different from a
shared library (Modules/CMakeCXXInformation.cmake):
if(NOT CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE)
set(CMAKE_CXX_LINK_EXECUTABLE
CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER FLAGS CMAKE_CXX_LINK_FLAGS LINK_FLAGS
OBJECTS -o TARGET LINK_LIBRARIES)
endif()
Andrew,
Thanks for letting me know. Let me know if you have any more issues.
Ben: at some point I was the maintainer for FindMPI. Are you the official
maintainer now? Do you want to be? I have very limited ability to test on
Windows, and that seems to be where most of the problems are.
FYI,
I also came across this discrepancy recently, and logged a bug for it.
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15427
With the example provided in the bug report, I am seeing link errors under
Xcode which I do not see under Makefiles.
Clint
On Monday, March 02, 2015 07:33:38 PM Roman
Ok, sounds good to me!
On 3/2/15, 11:10 AM, Ben Boeckel ben.boec...@kitware.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:19:00 -0800, Todd Gamblin wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Let me know if you have any more issues.
Ben: at some point I was the maintainer for FindMPI. Are you the
official
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 09:19:00 -0800, Todd Gamblin wrote:
Thanks for letting me know. Let me know if you have any more issues.
Ben: at some point I was the maintainer for FindMPI. Are you the official
maintainer now? Do you want to be? I have very limited ability to test on
Windows,
24 matches
Mail list logo