Steve,
I've queued this change:
Install: Move SetHaveInstallRule to a more-obvious place
https://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=commitdiff;h=9103d8ac
for merge to the 'release' branch for 3.4. What were the observed
effects of this regression?
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 8f876dfdc3d7f3b609f1b4aa9084bc60b86139a8 (commit)
via
On 11/06/2015 08:06 PM, Mark Stijnman wrote:
install(FILES 1.txt common.txt DESTINATION bin COMPONENT comp1)
install(FILES 2.txt common.txt DESTINATION bin COMPONENT comp2)
CMake does not implement any diagnostics that would prevent you from
doing so but installing distinct files (or even
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 113cd6847ae40078d49e5fd4b3aced9d83284032 (commit)
via
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=15838
==
Reported By:Mark Stijnman
Assigned To:
On 11/06/2015 05:31 PM, Michael Scott wrote:
>> increments the count by default instead of only when an explicit
>> option has been set. Please revise accordingly based on the attached
>> state.
> I don't quite follow. Setting "dev" to DIAG_WARN in DiagLevels, before
> the users input is parsed
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via ed484544cbf39ffefe1898b8255a5189062e5c60 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 0ecb5e7f8b02c96823104ab4b08773dccb12a2c8 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 9ad0ae1c01d67ba788645d3114967ba8718d4ec7 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via b5ff9b5676858ec63e0bbb84686ca7c5f495c47a (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, master has been updated
via 20e445f4418088ddf6e8f30ff3425af1588d2710 (commit)
via
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via e9dda568cef8da23dca873a9825d67ab93bbe2f4 (commit)
via
On 11/06/2015 05:16 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
> external project will have a file-dependency on clang?
>From a quick check it looks like ExternalProject has no interface
to directly add file-level dependencies to the builtin configure step.
That should be corrected if anyone is interested in
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via ee7fc8b23c16a7692ab398909551b7bed1022d3d (commit)
via
The goal of the old logic was to avoid populating the settings in the
cache if they are left as default. Instead you could check whether any
"dev" value has been set *after* parsing the options and if not then
set it to the default.
Ah okay I understand, that's no problem.
I've pretty much
On 2015-10-22 13:30-0400 Brad King wrote:
[...]
Plplot's Ada support uses CMake internal APIs so it is plplot's
responsibility to adapt to our changes:
[...]
Where Plplot currently writes:
SET(CMAKE_Ada_COMPILE_OBJECT
" -c -o
")
try:
if(NOT CMAKE_VERSION VERSION_LESS 3.4)
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, Andreas Naumann wrote:
Did boost change the naming convention? The documentation says, it should be
named with vc. And therefore, cmake cannot find the library...
Even the boost header files rely on the names in Visual studio. So, I would
assume, your boost installation to
Hello cmake-developers!
I spent couple of days adding IAR Workbench generator for ARM into CMake.
Locally, it has all features I originally wanted, and I thought of giving the
patch to everyone. The problem is, I do not know about the standards for making
such generator, e.g. CMake coding
Did boost change the naming convention? The documentation says, it
should be named with vc. And therefore, cmake cannot find
the library... Even the boost header files rely on the names in Visual
studio. So, I would assume, your boost installation to be broken?
Regards,
Andreas
Am 09.11.2015
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
https://cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=15839
==
Reported By:Egor Shokhin
Assigned To:
Hi Brad,
Thanks for the recommendation. I’ll give it a try today.
-Chris
> On Nov 9, 2015, at 6:29 AM, Brad King wrote:
>
> On 11/06/2015 05:16 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
>> external project will have a file-dependency on clang?
>
> From a quick check it looks like
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "CMake".
The branch, next has been updated
via 377027bdfcdef823f282c7d107984f2ac41310e3 (commit)
via
Hi Nils,
thanks for the reply.
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Nils Gladitz wrote:
> CMake does not implement any diagnostics that would prevent you from doing
> so but installing distinct files (or even the same file multiple times) to
> the same destination path is ill
The solution I came up with was the following..
SET_TESTS_PROPERTIES( ${TEST_NAME} PROPERTIES ENVIRONMENT
"PATH=${TCL_BINDIR};$ENV{PATH}" )
It worked like a charm.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: CMake [mailto:cmake-boun...@cmake.org] On Behalf Of Iosif Neitzke
Sent: Sunday,
_VERSION_MINOR 4)
-set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20151109)
+set(CMake_VERSION_PATCH 20151110)
#set(CMake_VERSION_RC 1)
---
Summary of changes:
Source/CMakeVersion.cmake |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
hooks/
My too fast read of your patch and message make me think
that the issue was about the file name.
Now I understand.
No problem, I know the CPack generated file names are a long-standing issue.
Indeed these seem to be two separate issues.
I've applied your patch for CPACK_DEBIAN__PACKAGE_NAME
Hi!
Can anyone tell me if CMake (or CTest) can be customized in a way to produce
decent benchmark output? An .xlsx perhaps, or something GnuPlot friendly? I
have not found any examples of CTest being (ab)used in this way.
Is my feeling correct, that this should be something like CBench?
I'm actually hitting a similar problem -- I know I've got boost_system
installed in
c:\dev2\i\lib\boost_system-vc-mt-1_55.dll
c:\dev2\i\lib\boost_system-vc-mt-1_55.lib
I run cmake like this:
cmake ..\krita -G"Visual Studio 14 Win64" -DBoost_DEBUG=ON
-DBoost_FIND_QUIETLY=FALSE
2015-11-08 20:01 GMT+01:00 Markus Rickert :
> This is a long standing issue with related bugs:
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12997
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=12574
>> http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=11050
>>
29 matches
Mail list logo