flags.
You have read the 2nd paragraph of COMPILE_FLAGS section in manual, haven't you.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
installation directory, locate FindBoost.cmake file,
open this file and read the comments where you have it explained very well.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com
=Debug
or
load myproj.sln in VS IDE and change configuration there.
Obviously, for makefiles, CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE is the way to go.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
Visual Studio
is choosing the default built type?
Eric, spot on!
Renato, if you create new project from within Visual Studio,
what build configuration is used as default? Debug.
Your problem has nothing to do with CMake.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered
:
you do can run make but the progress widget always
reports the same percentage. I was at 83% from start
to finish. Pretty puzzling :)
The above was with cmake version 2.8.1.
Could any one point where is the problem?
CMake misuse or bug indeed?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
On 13 January 2012 11:30, David Cole david.c...@kitware.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
A friend of mine has asked me to confirm if there may be a bug in CMake
related to file permissions on Unix. Here is the story:
There are some files
for unlimited time
without paying any money.So why not test it officially?
The fact it is technically possible, without a nag screen, etc.
does not mean it is legal. So, better check the EULA.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other
not work with CMake 2.6, but if not I think it may
important users can find about it scanning the ML archives.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
On 03/10/10 22:27, J Decker wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Hi,
I understand what the manual [1] says about LOCATION property that it is
more or less deprecated. Is that right?
I'm building software (shared libraries and executables) on both
( ... ${CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE}
I need it before firing up install procedures.
I build.
I run tests (here I need to know location of build output per target).
I install.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
On 04/10/10 05:40, Michael Wild wrote:
On 3. Oct, 2010, at 23:53 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 03/10/10 22:27, J Decker wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Mateusz
Loskotmate...@loskot.net wrote:
Hi,
I understand what the manual [1] says about LOCATION property
that it is more or less
On 04/10/10 12:01, Michael Wild wrote:
On 4. Oct, 2010, at 10:51 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 05:40, Michael Wild wrote:
On 3. Oct, 2010, at 23:53 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 03/10/10 22:27, J Decker wrote:
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Mateusz
Loskotmate...@loskot.net
On 04/10/10 14:24, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 10/04/2010 10:53 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 07:33, J Decker wrote:
CMAKE_INSTALL_CONFIG_NAME I don't know if there's a simple flag like
'project supports multiple targets' so I have an if(MSVC) set(
MULTI_TARGET) endif
On 03/10/10 18:28, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I understand what the manual [1] says about LOCATION property that it is
more or less deprecated. Is that right?
I'm building software (shared libraries and executables) on both, Linux
and Windows (using VS 2005, 2008, 2010) and I'm trying
On 05/10/10 02:52, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 10/04/2010 11:15 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 14:24, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 10/04/2010 10:53 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 07:33, J Decker wrote:
CMAKE_INSTALL_CONFIG_NAME I don't know if there's a simple flag like
'project
On 05/10/10 08:10, Michael Wild wrote:
On 5. Oct, 2010, at 3:52 , Michael Hertling wrote:
On 10/04/2010 11:15 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 14:24, Michael Hertling wrote:
On 10/04/2010 10:53 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 04/10/10 07:33, J Decker wrote:
CMAKE_INSTALL_CONFIG_NAME I
there are similar commands/tools possible for Git, Mercurial
and others.
[1]
http://websvn.kde.org/*checkout*/trunk/KDE/kdesdk/scripts/svn-clean?pathrev=499176
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
On 08/10/10 16:42, Michael Jackson wrote:
maybe SIZE_OF_VOID_POINTER of whatever that variable is in CMake?
In SOCI library, I use something like this:
if(UNIX AND CMAKE_SIZEOF_VOID_P EQUAL 4)
set(SOCI_LIBDIR lib64)
else()
set(SOCI_LIBDIR lib)
endif()
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
Yes, you are right.
My mistake.
Thanks!
Mat
On 08/10/10 16:51, David Cole wrote:
Either you've got that reversed, or 4 should be 8... right?
lib64 should be for an 8-byte void* ...
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
mailto:mate...@loskot.net wrote
On 24/10/10 20:07, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Michael Wild wrote:
On 24. Oct, 2010, at 17:33 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in
CMake. What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of
clang 2.8
similar but shorter effect on Windows.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
On 25/10/10 00:42, Sean McBride wrote:
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:33:01 +0100, Mateusz Loskot said:
I'm trying to find out what's the status of clang support in CMake.
What version of CMake is recommended to make proper use of clang 2.8+
for building a C++ software, etc.
Somewhat off-topic
test always reports the gnu.
if(${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID} MATCHES clang)
message(STATUS clang)
elseif(${CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID} MATCHES GNU)
message(STATUS gnu)
endif()
I will try 2.8.2 soon.
Thanks for your help!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member
On 25/10/10 01:38, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 24/10/10 23:00, Ryan Pavlik wrote:
My best guess would be to check for some Clang-specific defines,
similar to the platform checks. Actually, it looks like in the Git
repository of CMake, there is now some Clang-specific support:
http://github.com
Hi,
You may find the one in SOCI repo useful
http://soci.git.sf.net/
And go to src/cmake/modules
--
Mateusz Ĺoskot, http::/mateusz.loskot.net
(Sent from my mobile)
- Reply message -
From: Adam J Richardson fat...@crackmonkey.us
Date: Mon, Nov 1, 2010 11:48
Subject: [CMake]
On 01/11/10 15:31, Adam J Richardson wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 14:25:24 +
Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Hi,
You may find the one in SOCI repo useful
http://soci.git.sf.net/
And go to src/cmake/modules
Thanks Mateusz, that's great! I only needed to add odbc32 to the list
that
it will work.
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2008-March/020315.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
module
I support a few interesting features, like finding GDAL
in official distribution of OSGeo4W (http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/)
on Windows. Perhaps a merge would be beneficial.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU
outputs.
It is already there: Visual Studio 10
http://cmake.org/cmake/help/cmake-2-8-docs.html#section_Generators
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
= Generates Eclipse CDT 4.0 project files.
Regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
reported it long time ago:
http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=10158
Trivial, but confusing and should be fixed, IMO
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Member of ACCU, http://accu.org
___
Powered
On 18/01/11 18:07, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Dienstag 18 Januar 2011, 19:02:15 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
Am Dienstag 18 Januar 2011, 18:05:50 schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
On 18/01/11 16:15, David Cole wrote:
Your confusion is that you are looking for a 2010 -- there isn't one
-- there is Visual
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthreads - not found
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread
-- Looking for pthread_create in pthread - found
-- Found Threads: TRUE
Any workaround possible?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check
this way,
In my opinion behaviours of FindBoost is inconsistent in comparison
to other standard macros.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware
)
# - Setup the Executable output Directory -
SET (CMAKE_ARCHIVE_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY
${PROJECT_BINARY_DIR}/Bin )
Put that in the top most CMakelists.txt file
Michael,
Thank you for the quick solution.
It is exactly what I was looking for.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
, as these are C++ test frameworks, not C,
however I can truly recommend:
- TUT: C++ Template Unit Test Framework - very lightweight and powerful
- Boost UTF - much more featured, proper framework, but big.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
3. The only way to get error is to explicitly use REQUIRED option
FIND_PACKAGE(Boost 1.36 REQUIRED)
but for FIND_PACKAGE(ZLIB) as explained in point 2. above
it is not necessary to explicitly
and .cpp files (assigning list of files
to global variables) and, back in the main CMakeLists.txt, stream all
source files to single ADD_LIBRARY call.
Is that the best option?
What would be best way to configure such complex source tree that
outputs single library?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:41:27PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
The sources are organised in large number of subdirectories and
sort of logical sub-libraries, but the binary output of compilation
is a single library.
[snip]
It looks like the best portable approach
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Tyler Roscoe ty...@cryptio.net wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 08:41:27PM +0100, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
The sources are organised in large number of subdirectories and
sort of logical sub-libraries, but the binary output of compilation
with cmake.org too.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
of complex project
To: Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
Hi Mateusz,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
The sources are organised in large number of subdirectories and
sort of logical sub-libraries, but the binary output of compilation
is a single library
the subdirectories into the base scope with
set(... PARENT_SCOPE)
Interesting trick. Thanks!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Zitat von Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net:
Trying to figure out how to organise targets I got an idea to
configure these sub-libraries as static library targets
(e.g. libgdal_cpl, libgdal_alg, libgdal_gcore, etc.) which
eventually link to single shared library
/CMakeLists.txt#L668
I'm wondering if resulting Makefile (for GCC toolset) would allow to
handle multi-process/jobs building.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
What would be best way to configure such complex source tree that
outputs single library?
I'm trying to make my decision, so I would like to summary
our brainstorm.
AFAIU, linking the static libraries to single shared library
is still not recommended.
The recommended
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
What would be best way to configure such complex source tree that
outputs single library?
I'm trying to make my decision, so I would like to summary
our brainstorm.
AFAIU, linking the static
Detector
http://dmoulding.googlepages.com/vld
It is not a fully featured memory debugger, but it is a very
good leak checker, at least.
Best regards
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered
the analysis
and get result.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Hi,
There is SORT command for lists:
list(SORT list)
I believe it would make sense to have UNIQUE command too:
list(UNIQUE list)
unless it's already available and I've not read the doc
carefully, have I?
Perhaps it would be trivial to implement by CMake gurus :-)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz
flags for NMake makefiles.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Hi,
There is SORT command for lists:
list(SORT list)
I believe it would make sense to have UNIQUE command too:
list(UNIQUE list)
unless it's already available and I've not read the doc
carefully, have I?
Perhaps it would be trivial to implement by CMake gurus :-)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz
flags for NMake makefiles.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Tyler Roscoe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:17:04AM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
I believe it would make sense to have UNIQUE command too:
list(UNIQUE list)
unless it's already available and I've not read the doc
carefully, have I?
It's called REMOVE_DUPLICATES.
It looks exactly
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
In CMakeLists.txt I have something like this:
if(MSVC)
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS} /W4)
endif()
I configure my build using command prompt of Visual Studio 2005 (8.0):
D:\dev\geos
to try_compile based tests?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please
Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 24:55 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to perform the following checks:
check_function_exists(std::pow HAVE_POW)
or
check_symbol_exists(std::pow cmath HAVE_POW)
but it looks that both macros have troubles with resolving std::
namespace
Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 16:44 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Michael Wild wrote:
On 21. Jan, 2010, at 24:55 , Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to perform the following checks:
check_function_exists(std::pow HAVE_POW) or
check_symbol_exists(std::pow cmath HAVE_POW) but it looks
Eric Noulard wrote:
2010/1/21 Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net:
The fact check_function_exists checks C function but not C++ free
function is a bit confusing.
That's true.
AFAIU, CMake is dedicated to build C++ source code,
However that's look false to me :-(
Perhaps I should be more
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http
Jed Brown wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:44:43 +, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Why it can not work, actually?
C++ does name mangling so it's difficult to determine what the symbol
actually is (you have to know about various classes and templates that
may be in scope
, numpy,
...
What's the difference between Use*.cmake and Find*.cmake?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
Marcel Loose wrote:
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 01:20 +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
Hi,
I have just learned by trial and error that enable_testing()
macro should be called before a subdirector(y|ies) with tests
are added, otherwise tests are not configured.
Here is a bit of CMakeLists.txt in root
Bill Hoffman wrote:
For more information see my blog entry:
http://www.kitware.com/blog/home/post/7
Bill,
Great!
By the way of tutorial, SO'ers have been asking :-)
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2186110/cmake-tutorial/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
) user who preferes pretty website to read doc
than dark console :-)
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
Philip Lowman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Bill Hoffman wrote:
Eric Noulard wrote:
That's true, may be the site could indicate that the doc is for latest
2.6.x serie.
However the most trustfull way to check the doc of your current cmake
Bill Hoffman wrote:
- Add NMake Makefiles JOM generator
Is this the jom speedy thing from Trolls?
http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/03/27/speeding-up-visual-c-qt-builds/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Powered
/workshop/blob/master/cmake/modules/
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
, the CMake configuration assumes that Windows build
is done using MinGW.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
/home/mloskot/usr/include/geos/platform.h
-- Uninstalling /home/mloskot/usr/bin/geos-config
Am I correct?
[1] http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/RecipeAddUninstallTarget
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
case, you specify one-character alphabet
and it is still a random string of values from one element interval.
I don't see anything strange here myself.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
!
Absolutely, it helps! I'm glad getting my scripts reviewed.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http
because Visual C++ does not define strcasecmp.
This function is defined by POSIX (not even C99). Visual C++ does not
implement POSIX. For Visual C++, you should look for equivalents, it is:
_stricmp or _strnicmp
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http
made by Boost to officially include it
or when it would happen.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot
http://mateusz.loskot.net
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
provide some kind of abstraction for C-preprocessing?
I scanned the archives, but I only found preprocessing of fortran files
or solutions based on make capabilities (make myfile.i).
So, it's not quite what I'm looking for.
Could anyone help me with this?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
On 8 July 2012 13:34, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm porting build configuration based on GNU Autotools to CMake
and I have to deal with C preprocessing to generate a file.
The input for preprocessor is SQL file with C preprocessor directives
used, like #include
CFLAGS. Is there a variable I can define when I
run cmake, to pass the -m32 flag to gcc?
The list archives is a mine for basic problems solutions:
http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2009-April/028853.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
), 16.2 Source file inclusion, clauses 2 and 3
and notice the implementation-defined specified for both!.
i.e. they always work as .
This as is implementation-defined.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source
SQL files
VERBATIM
)
Hi Petr,
Your solution is perfect fit for my problem.
Thank you for the great explanation!
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe
functionality of those two modules is kept in sync.
The Slicer's version has been referred several times here anyway.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
://cmake.org/gitweb?p=cmake.git;a=blob;f=Modules/FindGit.cmake;h=f89d1afa3713629b240803f9cb868dfe070771d5;hb=HEAD
[2] https://github.com/Slicer/Slicer/blob/master/CMake/FindGit.cmake
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
On 12 July 2012 07:52, Rolf Eike Beer e...@sf-mail.de wrote:
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 12 July 2012 00:24, Aashish Chaudhary aashish.chaudh...@kitware.com
wrote:
I don't have both files in front of me. Whats the difference between
the one in the slicer and once in the CMake?
CMake's
it.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow
into the variable VTK_LIBRARIES or
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES?
http://www.cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.8/cmake.html#command:target_link_libraries
[item1 [item2 [...]]]
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects
it's relevant to console vs window-based app,
or what you mean as make it produce.
p.s. Please, be careful when you reply to post to cmake list,
but not to my address exclusively.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open
/CMake:Module_Maintainers#Compatibility
[3] http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2010-March/035596.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages
regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link
On 19 July 2012 14:45, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.com wrote:
On 7/18/2012 6:35 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
On 17 July 2012 14:34, Micha Renner micha.ren...@t-online.de wrote:
The following links of www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake generate 404 Errors
[...]
BTW, I try to maintain a short
an
expression of the form $TARGET_OBJECTS:objlib as a source
http://cmake.org/cmake/help/v2.8.8/cmake.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe
,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
Follow this link to subscribe
Hi,
Has the COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS file been removed
from the CMake sources?
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic
/028669.html
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
--
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at:
http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ
On 27 November 2012 14:47, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net
wrote:
On 27 November 2012 14:23, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Michael Jackson
mike.jack
() and find_library()?
A user of my library asked why
XXX_INCLUDE_DIR takes directory location, but
XXX_LIBRARIES takes absolute path to library file(s).
I've found it difficult to explain the rationale really.
I could not find any back up in the manual.
Best regards,
--
Mateusz Loskot, http
On 6 December 2012 18:45, Andreas Pakulat ap...@gmx.de wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Mateusz Loskot mate...@loskot.net wrote:
The CMake 2.8.10 manual includes the following statement in the paragraph
about link_directories() command:
Library locations returned by find_package
1 - 100 of 219 matches
Mail list logo
