Re: [cmake-developers] Bugfix for CPack / CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS

for those two lines :-) --- From 480a359e795d59d9176251f9d98dbadffafd9793 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Wirtz <daniel.wirtz.s...@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:30:05 +1300 Subject: [PATCH] Fixed the igno

[cmake-developers] Pssible documentation error in install(TARGETS ) signature

a bug in the parser (two-element keyword INCLUDES DESTINATION?)? any opinions welcome .. Best, Daniel -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a, D-70569 Stuttgart +49 (711) 685-60044 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the

[cmake-developers] Bugfix for CPack / CPACK_INSTALL_CMAKE_PROJECTS

me now. The offending lines of code have been committed in 2006 with c09c3c6bfadb41bd0b43082642ce76abbf02df06 - i doubt that no one ever tried to use something other than "/" since then? Or is there something else i'm missing? Best, Daniel -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf.

Re: [CMake] FindMPI uses wrong fortran include path

of MPI_Fortran_INCLUDE_PATH. Thanks -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a, D-70569 Stuttgart +49 (711) 685-60044 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware of

[CMake] Custom message if target fails

like to print something like "Whoops it went wrong, type this and that or visit this or that website for help" i know this should ALSO be in the documentation, but you know how people intuitively avoid reading those important parts :-) any help/ideas are appreciated. -- Dr. Daniel

Re: [CMake] Custom message if target fails

Hey, neat idea, i've tried and it works (i have custom targets there). However, the "nice" colored build text output of such a solution gets lost completely (pipes etc); are there any alternative ideas/solutions? thanks again! Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. S

Re: [cmake-developers] added get_git_revision and get_git_branch commands as follow-up to cm...@cmake.org

mentioning.. now we kinda have three propositions regarding git version info "out there". this leads me to the question on how the decision making process within the CMake devs is ideally organized? should there be some "specifications" on what should be possible? Daniel Dr. Dani

[cmake-developers] Moving from Module to Target-based linking

e feedback and suggestions how that could be of use in CMake. - Daniel -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 # Appends a library to the list of interface_link_libraries function(append_link_library TARGET LIB) get_target_property(CURRENT_ILL

Re: [cmake-developers] automatically download library

it's not cmake, but it also deals with the "is package there, if not, i know where to get & build it" issue. good luck :-) Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 On 10/06/2015 02:22 PM, Марсель Галимуллин wrote: Hello! I'm student

[cmake-developers] added get_git_revision and get_git_branch commands as follow-up to cm...@cmake.org

uot; file to include, but that 1) restricts possible languages and 2) will require an extra build target that is run each build etc. any thoughts? Daniel Signed-off-by: Daniel Wirtz <daniel.wi...@simtech.uni-stuttgart.de> --- Modules/FindGit.cmake | 145 +

[cmake-developers] C|CXX Standards Handling

. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and check the CMake FAQ at: http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake_FAQ Kitware offers various services to support the CMake community. For more

[CMake] Intel C99 standard

-std=c99" c flags. so has that simply not come up yet or is there a reason cmake does not add those flags for intel? thanks! -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 -- Powered by www.kitware.com Please keep messages on-topic and

[CMake] FindGit.cmake proposal

this included, feel free to include any part of it in future releases. if this is not the "right way" of proposing such things, where to go to? cheers Daniel -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 #.rst: # FindGit # --- # # # # The modu

[CMake] Object targets and link libraries

are there any other (less involved) solutions? i need the objects of foo inside a larger target and want to avoid having a separate library being build that needs extra linking. cheers! -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 -- Powered by ww

Re: [CMake] Missing -lgfortran with FortranCInterface verify calls

Hey all, sorry for the late reply but that indeed fixes the issue! thanks Brad. On 28.08.2015 17:15, Brad King wrote: On 08/27/2015 03:24 AM, Daniel Wirtz wrote: CMake 3.3.0. [snip] after checking, the @CMakeFiles/VerifyFortranC.dir/linklibs.rsp does not contain the "-lgfortran&quo

[CMake] Missing -lgfortran with FortranCInterface verify calls

something obvious here or is this still an (mingw-only) issue? to be clear, i can just skip the verification tests and everything works, but i'd like to think that if that is the case the FortranCInterface_VERIFY() should work as well. thanks! Daniel -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC

Re: [CMake] Preventing CMakeLists from being too similar

into the module folders with appropriate different values inserted. i'd go for the second option myself. cheers Daniel Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech Pfaffenwaldring 5a +49 711 685 60044 On 07/06/2015 02:41 PM, Crast, Nicholas wrote: Hi guys, I have a question for you about general

[CMake] Long command lines

packages; e.g. the fortran preprocessor from intel (in the version we have, cant be upgraded) only allows 4K command lines :-( are there any setting in cmake that could help with that? does anyone have experience with that? thanks! -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl. Math. Dipl. Inf. SRC SimTech

[CMake] Conditional transitive link libraries

unless you magically knew that libz is a dependent link library of libA and where to include it from. Including the absolute path to libz in libA's config is also not the way to go, as it ruins the portability over different systems. Is there a native CMake way? Thanks! -- Dr. Daniel Wirtz Dipl