Re: [CMake] CMake'ified Boost

2013-02-24 Thread Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Hi James, Make sens. Thanks for the follow up. Jc On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 5:06 AM, James Turner james.tur...@kdab.com wrote: No I'm simply using custom build and update commands to run bootstrap.sh and bjam with appropriate args. I suspect this is the piece the Xcode generator can't cope

Re: [CMake] CMake'ified Boost

2013-02-23 Thread James Turner
No I'm simply using custom build and update commands to run bootstrap.sh and bjam with appropriate args. I suspect this is the piece the Xcode generator can't cope with, but I didn't have time to investigate in detail yet. Regards, James On 21 Feb 2013, at 17:59, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin

Re: [CMake] CMake'ified Boost

2013-02-22 Thread Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Thanks for the pointer. I am curious to set what will be the outcome. I will try to contact them to see why the github repo is down: http://github.com/boost-lib On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Bill Hoffman bill.hoff...@kitware.comwrote: On 2/21/2013 12:59 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin

[CMake] CMake'ified Boost

2013-02-21 Thread Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin
Hi James, On a slightly different topic, you mentioned you were using Boost, did you find a version of boost 1.49 that was CMake'ified ? Here is the one I found: http://gitorious.org/boost/cmake/trees/cmake-1.49.0 Thanks Jc On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Bill Hoffman

Re: [CMake] CMake'ified Boost

2013-02-21 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 2/21/2013 12:59 PM, Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin wrote: Hi James, On a slightly different topic, you mentioned you were using Boost, did you find a version of boost 1.49 that was CMake'ified ? Here is the one I found: http://gitorious.org/boost/cmake/trees/cmake-1.49.0 Thanks Jc There