Re: [CMake] Does enable_language(CUDA) still have the problem with reconfiguring?

2019-04-01 Thread Robert Maynard via CMake
Yes, we are dependent on the CUDA extensions for ms-build working correctly. On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 5:02 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 22:11, Robert Maynard via CMake wrote: > > > > For MSBuild we rely on the CUDA extensions written by nvidia which do > > proper dependency

Re: [CMake] Does enable_language(CUDA) still have the problem with reconfiguring?

2019-04-01 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 22:11, Robert Maynard via CMake wrote: > > For MSBuild we rely on the CUDA extensions written by nvidia which do > proper dependency tracking. Except when they don't. It drove me nearly crazy that any given trivial change had to be followed by a complete rebuild of the

Re: [CMake] Does enable_language(CUDA) still have the problem with reconfiguring?

2019-04-01 Thread Robert Maynard via CMake
It doesn't have this behavior. For Makefile and Ninja generators we get the proper header dependencies at compile time just like we do for C or C++. For MSBuild we rely on the CUDA extensions written by nvidia which do proper dependency tracking. On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 4:12 PM JR Cary wrote: >

[CMake] Does enable_language(CUDA) still have the problem with reconfiguring?

2019-03-30 Thread JR Cary
Re the thread below, Does the newer, enable_languagedo a better job of not having the repeated reconfigurations and full project rebuilds as described at https://cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2011-January/042173.html and many times after? John On 3/30/19 6:45 AM, cmake-requ...@cmake.org wrote: