Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake?

2011-07-06 Thread Bello, Musodiq O (GE Healthcare)
, Musodiq O (GE Healthcare) Cc: cmake@cmake.org Subject: Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake? This has been discussed a gazillion times, and the answer will always be the same: no. It's impossible. A build tree always depends on CMake, and is not relocatable. Live with it. If your

Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake?

2011-07-06 Thread Michael Wild
:19 AM *To:* Bello, Musodiq O (GE Healthcare) *Cc:* cmake@cmake.org *Subject:* Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake? This has been discussed a gazillion times, and the answer will always be the same: no. It's impossible. A build tree always depends on CMake

Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake?

2011-07-06 Thread Alexander Neundorf
On Wednesday 06 July 2011, Bello, Musodiq O (GE Healthcare) wrote: Thanks, Michael. But is there a way to make the references to CMake a relative path rather than an absolute path? This will allow us to bundle CMake with the source tree. You can bundle CMake with the source tree, but you can't

Re: [CMake] Makefiles without reference to CMake?

2011-07-02 Thread Michael Wild
This has been discussed a gazillion times, and the answer will always be the same: no. It's impossible. A build tree always depends on CMake, and is not relocatable. Live with it. If your users don't want to use CMake, provide them with a convenience script that does the hard work for them.