The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13247
==
Reported By:4ertus2
Assigned To:
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=13248
==
Reported By:Sergei Golubchik
Assigned To:
Eric,
Please take a look at this request:
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/pull/5
Only the first commit is relevant, the rest are merges from upstream.
You can fetch the relevant part of the branch like this:
$ git fetch git://github.com/Fraser999/CMake.git master
$ git checkout -b
Andreas, Nicolas,
Please take a look at this request:
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/pull/9
You can fetch the branch like this:
$ git fetch git://github.com/viandfraich/CMake.git
add_executable_jar-in-UseJava
$ git checkout -b add_executable_jar-in-UseJava 717f1586
Thanks,
-Brad
--
Brad,
This issue must be closed. It has been fixed by these patches:
18e8d2f0ccfd853425c86b092693ac11db9ab906
525bb92a3d4149aae1b268315ac746a6142d1fec
17a8e16cd243f06597ad1246775f80fc5a4337b4
Cheers,
-Nico
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
Andreas,
On 05/25/2012 09:26 AM, Nicolas Desprès wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com wrote:
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/pull/9
This issue must be closed. It has been fixed by these patches:
18e8d2f0ccfd853425c86b092693ac11db9ab906
2012/5/25 Brad King brad.k...@kitware.com:
Eric,
Please take a look at this request:
https://github.com/Kitware/CMake/pull/5
Only the first commit is relevant, the rest are merges from upstream.
You can fetch the relevant part of the branch like this:
$ git fetch
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13249
==
Reported By:Travis Horine
Assigned To:
Hi,
I've re-pushed to my gitorious clone.
Brad King wrote:
On 05/17/2012 08:36 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
Done and re-pushed to my clone. I still have to write the unit tests, but
I think it can be reviewed again at this point.
Great start. Here are some comments.
The Update the
On 05/25/2012 04:47 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I've re-pushed to my gitorious clone.
Thanks. I'll review when I get a chance.
AddPositionIndependentFlags shouldn't care whether the library is
shared or not, right?
My vague understanding up to now has been that static libraries should not
Brad King wrote:
On 05/19/2012 04:45 PM, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
On Thursday 17 May 2012, David Cole wrote:
I don't think this conditional stuff in generator expressions is a good
idea at all.
Me too ;-)
The goal is to allow per-configuration/per-language/per-xyz values to
appear in
Brad King wrote:
On 05/25/2012 04:47 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
I've re-pushed to my gitorious clone.
Thanks. I'll review when I get a chance.
Something else that occured to me was that there's no way currently in the
branch to use both POSITION_INDEPENDENT_CODE and set FLAGS for all
12 matches
Mail list logo
